Elder Financial Abuse Act - Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai, Robert Parsons, Sheryl Sandberg, Aman Bhutani, Andy Jassy, Have Committed Several Felonies Against This Elder - Careless People Book

These 7 individuals shown above, Mark Zuckerberg & Sheryl Sandberg of Meta/Facebook, Jeff Bezos & Andy Jassy of Amazon, Sundar Pichai of Google and Aman Bhutani & Robert Parsons of GoDaddy committed numerous felonies against this elder website owner and should be prosecuted for their crimes and sentenced to prison for the maximum allowed by law because they deliberately and intentionally with malice perpetrated criminal actions knowing that their behavior would cause considerable harm physically, emotionally and financially therefore they deserve to be incarcerated for each and every crime committed.

The websites ElderAbuseAct.com and ElderFinancialAbuseAct.com are a repository of information regarding the Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy conducted by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, his executive team at Meta Platforms Inc. along with the founder and former CEO of Amazon.com Jeff Bezos, and the current CEO of Amazon.com Andy Jassy, and several of their executive staff along with the CEO of Google Sundar Pichai, along with Ruth Porst, Philip Schindler, Thomas Kurian, Kent Walker, Lorraine Twohill, Peter Osterich and Sergey Brin also Robert Parsons, the founder and former CEO of GoDaddy and the current CEO of GoDaddy Aman Bhutani, and several of their executives including Blake Irving, Scott Wagner and Ray Winborne among others towards the owner of this elder abuse act website.

The focus of this website is to identify the perpetrators to the public of numerous State and Federal crimes against this elder and expose the various criminal acts they have committed, so that the specific governmental agencies and authorities will be notified and begin investigating, and eventually prosecute those responsible and after conviction, sentence the guilty to the incarceration in either jail or prison, whichever is most appropriate, thereby using their punishments as a deterrent for others to realize that crime does not pay, and prove to the public once and for all that no one is above the law and “if you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime”.

Elder Abuse in California is both a Civil and Criminal Offense.

Financial Elder Abuse is defined as “when a person or entity…takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder…for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.”

The California Elder Abuse Act was enacted in 1982 and has added several amendments over the past forty-two years.

If the financial harm against the elder exceeds $950 then the crime is considered a felony. The penalty for this crime is up to 4 years in county jail and a $10,000 fine for each separate illegal act.

California Penal Code 368 (d) Financial Abuse of Elders and Dependent Adults (Non Caretaker) Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Kurian, Lorraine Twohill, Kent Walker, Peter Osterich, Sergey Brin and Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and several of their respective executives have committed numerous felonies and are most likely to be indicted, charged, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for up to 4 years in county jail for each count along with countless thousands of dollars in fines each and if the majority of their company executives were also sent to jail, then there won’t be anyone left at their organizations to conduct the business, therefore the value of their company stock would be reduced exponentially, which could in turn affect the entire United States Stock Market.

Whether or not a wrongful taking has occurred is often at the core of any elder financial abuse case.

Now for the facts of the crimes:

California Elder Abuse Act which this website “ElderAbuseAct.com” Penal Code 368 as the crimes are all laid out, “ElderFinancialAbuseAct.com” both gives a detailed description of the crimes, the matching Federal “Elder Justice Act“ ergo “www.ElderAbuseAct.comElderFinancialAbuseAct.com”
Criminal Conspiracy 182 PC,
Violation of the Protected Whistleblower Act,
Identity Theft Penal Code § 530.5,
Fraud, Penal Codes 484 & 532,
Embezzlement California Penal Code 503,
Conversion Penal Code § 507,
California Penal Code 484 Larceny,
Mail Fraud similar to Wire Fraud,
Wire Fraud 502(c)(1) & 18 U.S. Code § 1343,
California Welfare & Institutions Code 15610.30 Financial Abuse,
RICO Act 18 U.S.C. 1961-68 and the matching
California Penal Code § 530.5,
Grand Theft 487 PC & Title 18 Chapter 13 as per GoDaddy,
Receiving Stolen Property 496(a) PC,
Violation of my First Amendment Rights by preventing my Freedom of Speech and the plethora of crimes make it literally to many to ignore!

These domain names will be used to promote the book “Careless People”which is a scathing memoir about the despicable actions of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg of Meta, formerly Facebook, and the inappropriate and potentially illegal behavior to affiliate Meta with China.

“A cautionary tale of power, greed and lost idealism”.

aCarelessPeople.com
MetaQuestHeadsets.com
MetaQuestMetaverse.com
MetaPlatformsAI.com
HorizonMetaverse.com
MetaWhistleblowers.com
FacebookWhistleblowers.com
MetaChildAbuse.com
FacebookChildAbuse.com
MetaPedophiles.com
FacebookPedophiles.com
MetaHumanTrafficking.com
FacebookHumanTrafficking.com
RealityLabsMetaverse.com
RealityLabsWearables.com
RealityMetaverse.com
VirtualRealityMetaverse.com
MetaCambridgeAnalytica.com
FacebookCambridgeAnalytica.com
CambridgeAnalyticaLawsuit.com
CambridgeAnalyticaScandal.com
GoogleWhistleblowers.com
AppleMonopoly.com
ElderAbuseAct.com
ElderFinancialAbuseAct.com

A woman who formerly worked for Meta / Facebook’s ex-operations chief Sheryl Sandberg, claims she was tasked with drafting “Talking Points” for her boss while she was in labor with her first child.

Sarah Wynn-Williams, the author of the explosive memoir about her six year tenure at the company that was then known as Facebook.

You can purchase this book from Barnes and Noble or Amazon for example, it is a must read and you will find out a great deal how Mark Zuckerberg treats his employees and how his illegal behavior has inflicted severe harm and pain against this website owner while committing numerous felonies for which he should be incarcerated in prison.

Careless People goes a long way in showing how much criminal behavior he has committed for many years and anyone who wants to learn more about his unethical and dangerous unlawful conduct is ongoing and he should be held accountable for his many crimes.

A former Facebook executive is making waves with a new memoir about the company's current and former leaders, including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg — including surprising anecdotes that are being dismissed by Meta as "false and defamatory."

And then there’s what Joel Kaplan, currently Meta’s chief global affairs officer, allegedly did to Wynn-Williams at a boozy corporate shindig in 2017. She claimed that he called her “sultry” and rubbed his body against hers on the dancefloor. This wasn’t a one-off incident, she claims: indeed, there was a group at Facebook called Feminist Fight Club, whose members compared notes on such reportedly prevalent cases of sexual harassment by execs. An internal investigation cleared Kaplan of impropriety and soon after Wynn-Williams was fired for making misleading harassment allegations.

Wynn-Williams also claims in her book that Sandberg asked her assistant to buy lingerie for them both, which allegedly totaled $13,000.

The younger employee allegedly told Wynn-Williams that, according to the book, she was “very conscious of the benefits of being Sheryl’s ‘little doll,’ as she calls it and having Sheryl tell her she loves her.”

Wynn-Williams continues: “She’s the one who explained to me the benefits of ‘being on the pedestal”.

A spokesman for Sandberg declined to comment on the book.

But another source who worked at Facebook at the same time as Wynn-Williams and Sandberg, and who was present for some of the anecdotes recounted in Careless People, tells PEOPLE that Wynn-Williams' depiction of events is so distorted as to be "laughable.”

The company also immediately pushed back on Wynn-Williams’ account, which was published by Flatiron Books on Tuesday, March 11.

This book is a mix of out-of-date and previously reported claims about the company and false accusations about our executives,” a company spokesperson tells PEOPLE in a statement.

“Eight years ago, Sarah Wynn-Williams was fired for poor performance and toxic behavior, and an investigation at the time determined she made misleading and unfounded allegations of harassment," the spokesperson went on to say. "Since then, she has been paid by anti-Facebook activists and this is simply a continuation of that work. Whistleblower status protects communications to the government, not disgruntled activists trying to sell books.”

For Wynn-Williams, writing the book was a way — in her view — to expose how Facebook leaders, like Sandberg and CEO/founder Zuckerberg, and company-wide issues led to her disillusionment of the highly influential social media platform.

For example, in Careless People, Wynn-Williams recounts what she describes as the shocking lengths Zuckerberg took to get Facebook into the Chinese market, and the widespread effects of hate speech on the platform.

The Meta spokesperson says they are pursuing "immediate legal action due to the false and defamatory nature of the allegations" in Wynn-Williams' book. The spokesperson did not provide more details.

For Wynn-Williams, working at Facebook came at great personal cost, especially when she was pregnant, she writes.

She remembers drafting talking points for Sandberg while she was in the hospital about to give birth, and traveling internationally while pregnant.

"Looking back, I still can’t quite believe it. I’m ashamed," she writes. "And I can’t blame this entirely on Facebook. I’ve been this kind of driven person my whole life. I don’t like to let people down. But it’s also true that at Facebook, I didn’t feel like I had a choice."

It was during one of the trips abroad that, Wynn-Williams writes, she witnessed Sandberg sleeping next to her assistant — and was later asked by the COO herself to join Sandberg in bed, Wynn-Williams claims.

According to Careless People, Sandberg asked Wynn-Williams to “come to bed” twice on a private jet where there was only one bed during a long flight back to the U.S. Wynn-Williams refused.

However, the source who worked with them both at Meta and was present during international travel as well says that Wynn-Williams is misconstruing what may have happened.

This source says that while they can't remember the specifics — given how long ago it was — it was much more likely that Sandberg was merely trying to get Wynn-Williams to take some rest in the limited sleeping quarters available on the plane.

But for Wynn-Williams, these interactions stood in stark contrast to the values of Sandberg’s 2013 bestseller. Lean In outlines the ways women can gain power in the workplace and at home – and speak out against sexual harassment and uncomfortable workplace dynamics.

During her maternity leave, Wynn-Williams also struggled to navigate new motherhood and the expectations of her job, especially during her interactions with Joel Kaplan, according to her book.

Kaplan, the vice president of U.S. policy, who once dated Sandberg, was Wynn-Williams’ then-manager.

In her memoir, Wynn-Williams writes how Kaplan made her uneasy following the birth of her second child: He insisted they video conference during her maternity leave, according to the book. And when she had complications after delivery, requiring her to have surgery, he pressed her, “But where are you bleeding from?”

Most days, working on policy at Facebook was way less like enacting a chapter from Machiavelli,” Wynn-Williams writes in Careless People, “and way more like watching a bunch of fourteen-year-olds who’ve been given superpowers and an ungodly amount of money, as they jet around the world to figure out what power has bought and brought them."

Careless People is on sale now.

In Careless People, published this week, Sarah Wynn-Williams claims Sandberg, the company’s former chief operating officer, who built her brand in part on female empowerment with her book Lean In, had an intimate connection with her 26-year-old assistant that involved sleeping on each other during a business trip and wearing expensive lingerie that Sandberg allegedly asked her to purchase.

They had “taken turns sleeping in each other’s laps, occasionally stroking each other’s hair,” writes Wynn-Williams, who worked for Facebook (now known as Meta) for seven years as the director of global public policy, “while I tried to make myself as small and invisible as possible, feeling uncomfortable with what I was seeing.”

March 12th Reuters Meta Platforms

Former Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg fabricated a claim that she was planning to take an Asiana Airlines flight that ended up crash-landing in San Francisco more than a decade ago, killing 3 and injuring nearly 200, according to one of her ex-subordinates.

Sarah Wynn-Williams, who worked under Sandberg for six years as director of public policy when the company was known as Facebook, alleged in her new memoir that CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s former No. 2 “lie[d] about narrowly missing” Asiana Airlines Flight 214.

“People don’t lie about narrowly missing plane crashes, do they?” Wynn-Williams wrote in her memoir titled “Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism.”

In Careless People, Sarah Wynn-Williams claims Sheryl Sandberg had an intimate connection with her 26-year-old assistant during her time at Facebook.

For Wynn-Williams, working at Facebook came at great personal cost, especially when she was pregnant, she writes.

On Wednesday won an emergency arbitration ruling to temporarily stop promotion of the tell-all book "Careless People" by a former employee, according to a copy of the ruling published by the social media company.

The book by Meta's former director of global public policy, Sarah Wynn-Williams, was called by the New York Times book review "an ugly, detailed portrait of one of the most powerful companies in the world," and its leading executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg and Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan.

Meta will suffer "immediate and irreparable loss" in the absence of an emergency relief, the American Arbitration Association's emergency arbitrator, Nicholas Gowen, said in a ruling after a hearing, which Wynn-Williams did not attend.

Book publisher Macmillan attended and argued it was not bound by the arbitration agreement, which was part of a severance agreement between the employee and company.

The ruling says that Wynn-Williams should stop promoting the book and, to the extent she could, stop further publication. It did not order any action by the publisher.

Meta spokesman Andy Stone said in a post on Threads: "This ruling affirms that Sarah Wynn Williams' false and defamatory book should never have been published.".

Wynn-Williams and Macmillan did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the ruling.Reporting by Juby Babu in Mexico City; Editing by Michael Perry

An explosive insider account charting one woman’s career at the heart of one of the most influential companies on the planet, Careless People gives you a front-row seat to Meta, the decisions that have shaped world events in recent decades, and the people who made them.

Careless People is darkly funny and genuinely shocking...Not only does [Sarah Wynn-Williams] have the storytelling chops to unspool a gripping narrative; she also delivers the goods." -Jennifer Szalai, The New York Times

Overview

An explosive memoir charting one woman’s career at the heart of one of the most influential companies on the planet, Careless People gives you a front-row seat to Facebook, the decisions that have shaped world events in recent decades, and the people who made them.

From trips on private jets and encounters with world leaders to shocking accounts of misogyny and double standards behind the scenes, this searing memoir exposes both the personal and the political fallout when unfettered power and a rotten company culture take hold. In a gripping and often absurd narrative where a few people carelessly hold the world in their hands, this eye-opening memoir reveals what really goes on among the global elite.

Sarah Wynn-Williams tells the wrenching but fun story of Facebook, mapping its rise from stumbling encounters with juntas to Mark Zuckerberg’s reaction when he learned of Facebook’s role in Trump’s election. She experiences the challenges and humiliations of working motherhood within a pressure cooker of a workplace, all while Sheryl Sandberg urges her and others to “lean in.”

Careless People is a deeply personal account of why and how things have gone so horribly wrong in the past decade—told in a sharp, candid, and utterly disarming voice. A deep, unflinching look at the role that social media has assumed in our lives, Careless People reveals the truth about the leaders of Facebook: how the more power they grasp, the less responsible they become and the consequences this has for all of us.

If Douglas Coupland’s 1995 novel about young tech workers, Microserfs, were a dystopian tragedy, it might read something like Careless People. The author narrates, in a fizzy historic present, her youthful idealism when she arrives at Facebook ((now Meta) to work on global affairs in 2011, after a stint as an ambassador for New Zealand.

Some years later she finds a female agency worker having a seizure on the office floor, surrounded by bosses who are ignoring her. The scales falling from her eyes become a blizzard. These people, she decides, just “didn’t give a fuck”

Mark Zuckerberg’s firstMmeeting with a head of state was with the Russian prime minister,Dmitry Medvedev, in 2012. He was sweaty and nervous, but slowly he acquires a taste for the limelight.

He asks (unsuccessfully) to be sat next to Fidel Castro at a dinner. In 2015 he asks Xi Jinping if he’ll “do him the honor of naming his unborn child”. (Xi refuses.) He’s friendly with Barack Obama, until the latter gives him a dressing-down about fake news.

In 2016, Facebook embeds staff in Donald Trump’s campaign “alongside Trump campaign programmers, ad copywriters, media buyers, network engineers, and data scientists”, helping him win. This inspires Zuckerberg to consider running for president himself, and he tours US swing states in 2017. Wynn-Williams describes his speeches as sounding “like what a kid thinks a president sounds like”. One goes: “The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, act anew.” Zuckerberg calls politicians unfriendly to Facebook adversaries and instructs his team to apply pressure to ‘pull them over to our side’Meanwhile, in an effort to do business in China, his company has been offering the Chinese Communist party a “white-glove service”, and a genocide has occurred in Myanmar following a flood of false anti-Muslim stories posted on Facebook. In time Facebook abandons its idea to give developing countries free access to the internet, or at least Facebook, pivots to the “metaverse”, a bad virtual-reality game populated by people who for a long time did not have legs, and finally pivots again to AI.

Zuckerberg, in short, turns out to be a giant man-baby suffering from a severe case of the Dunning-Kruger effect, whereby people overestimate their own cognitive abilities. His colleagues obsequiously let him win at board games. He calls politicians unfriendly to Facebook “adversaries” and instructs his team to apply pressure to “pull them over to our side”. He blames his assistants when he forgets his own passport.

Floating through the book like a toxic ice queen, meanwhile, is Facebook’s COO, Sheryl Sandberg.

Wynn-Williams isn’t buying her “Lean In” talk. In one of two remarkable body-horror interludes in the book (the first is when she is almost eaten by a shark as a child), Wynn-Williams nearly dies in childbirth, but she is still harassed for work updates during her recovery. When she returns to the office her male boss gives her an unflattering performance review. “You weren’t responsive enough,” he says. “In my defense,” she replies, “I was in a coma for some of it.”

This sounds like a job for a famous champion of women in the workplace. “Friends who have fallen for Sheryl’s Lean In schtick,” Wynn-Williams writes, “earnestly recommend going to her with my concerns.” But she is not convinced. She has already been sent to a Zika hotspot while heavily pregnant, and to Japan while pregnant again, to help promote Sandberg’s book.

Wynn-Williams left Facebook in 2018 to work on “unofficial negotiations between the US and China on AI weapons”. Has the company’s office culture improved since then? A clue might be Zuckerberg’s recent appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast. He complains that corporate culture has become too “neutered” and needs a new injection of “masculine energy”. In February, he visited the White House to talk to Donald Trump about AI.

Editor’s note: since this review was written Meta has responded to Wynn-Williams’ book, calling it “a mix of out-of-date and previously reported claims about the company and false accusations about our executives”.

Donald Trump, the 47th President of the United States has filed this lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook Inc. for violating his First Amendment rights by Censoring his Freedom of Speech Mark Zuckerberg has committed numerous felonies for which he should be arrested, charged and convicted, then he should be sentenced to several years in prison. President Trump has stated emphatically that Mark Zuckerberg should be imprisoned!

In conducting further research regarding the criminal activity by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook it appears that this Elder’s privacy may also have been compromised and therefore the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) needs to be notified so that they could do their own thorough investigation to determine whether this was indeed violated, hence another substantial fine might need to be imposed, similar to the $5 Billion fine paid by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook in 2019, which became the largest breach of privacy penalty by any organization in the world, and this scenario could potentially be a repeat performance by Mark Zuckerberg.

Maybe Mark Zuckerberg and his various colleagues are not quite ready to spend time in prison yet but the felonies that he and the entire leadership team at Meta are more than likely to de convicted of several crimes along with Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Sergey Brin, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and their executive staff could be facing charges that could in fact send all of these criminals to prison for a considerable length of time together.

The United States Department of Justice, the US Attorney General along with the California Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General and even the Los Angeles District Attorney all need to be notified about the contents of this website so they can hopefully begin their respective investigations to determine to what extent these organizations and their respective executives regarding their criminal behavior and precisely how they have violated the specific laws referenced herein and to ascertain whether they have violated both State and Federal laws. Must of the crimes have been brought about here so as to leave no doubt about which crimes have occurred and who the perpetrators are.

Also the vast majority of governments around the world need to notified as well so they too can conduct due diligence and initiate their own investigations to determine what laws of there countries have been violated.

Australia, based on the law that they just passed November 28, 2024 to protect their children under the age of 16 needs to be adopted by others and hopefully so will the other large countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, India, Ireland and South Africa for starters of which will be sent this entire website so that they all will know how despicable these criminals truly are so they can determine whether they wish to continue doing business with them .

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a Federal Law (codified at 18 U.S.C. 1961-68) targeting organized criminal activity and racketeering.

The state of California has its own version of RICO Penal Code Sections 186.2 and 186.3 which includes forfeiture of profits derived from the criminal activity.

Federal RICO and California’s statutes share similarities in their approach requiring the occurrence of at least two specific offenses within a stipulated timeframe, typically a decade.

Forfeiture of property does not prevent the state of California from pursuing charges for the underlying crimes.

A sentence of imprisonment or other punishments may still be possible if the state wins a conviction on a separate charge and the penalties will depend on the nature of the underlying charges.

Organized crime laws focus on the financial profits gained by crime enterprises or associations through their participation in criminal activities.

Accordinaly California state law seeks to punish and deter participants from racketeering and organized crime through forfeiture laws. During forfeiture, the state seizes control and possession of the defendant’s property.

California racketeering laws are intended to focus only on the profits and proceeds from criminal activities. This makes the prospect of forfeiture quite devastating to the defendants.

Penalties for racketeering convictions in California can be severe and hinge upon case specifics. Probation may be an option in certain scenarios but incarceration is the frequent outcome.

Depending on the gravity of the charges, sentences range up to 20 years or even life imprisonment in a federal prison. Defendants may also face asset forfeiture, liens on their property, and restitution to their victims and even Deportation if the person is not a citizen.

RICO enhances existing criminal punishments and creates new causes of action for acts done as part of an organized criminal enterprise which can only be determined through an investigation of same.

RICO can be applied to individuals involved in a conspiracy to commit racketeering activities which means even those indirectly involved in the enterprise or its corrupt activities may face RICO charges if they conspired to further the criminal objectives.

A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed ; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment.

An enterprise” is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.

Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statue in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition.

“Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other.

A conviction under RICO has serious consequences. Not only does the RICO statute provide for criminal penalties including 20 years in prison, but the financial penalties are also quite severe.

A person convicted can face a fine of either $250,000 or double the amount of proceeds earned from the illicit activity. The prison time can increase from 20 years up to a life sentence depending on the underlying crimes that was committed.

The power of RICO lies in its “CONSPIRACY PROVISION”, based on an enterprise rationale, that allows tying together apparently unrelated crimes with a common objective into a prosecutable pattern of racketeering.

The RICO statue expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. 1962.

The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role.

The government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant’s ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise.

In the establishment of RICO, there was the fear that assets associated with the enterprise would disappear before a final judgment was issued.

RICO rules of procedure allow the government to freeze the assets of the defendant prior to the case even going to trial. The reasoning behind this was that making the government wait until a guilty verdict was entered would allow time for these assets to be well hidden. In the event of a conviction, forfeiture of the defendant’s entire interest in the enterprise is handed over to the government. Because of the loss of these assets, the enterprise can suffer irreparable harm and even dismantlement.

There are 35 distinct offenses that fall within the RICO statute of which Conspiracy, Elder Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as to GoDaddy) Mail and Wire fraud are eight of them of which only two are necessary to fulfill requirements for both Federal and California statutes and these establish patterns of criminal behavior, and even the possibility of Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.

The eight most prevalent elements of RICO regarding the individuals and organizations contained herein which are considered “predicate offenses” are Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as these relate to GoDaddy) Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, and only two are required to establish those which are necessary to establish violations and convictions of RICO act. These organizations may have also committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.

Mail Fraud is prosecuted under the Mail Fraud Act which was formulated in 1872. The federal government has jurisdiction if the illegal activity crosses interstate or international borders. There are two elements in mail fraud: (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail which includes the electronic transmission of information for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).

Under California law, Penal Code section 484 Fraud, is the misrepresentation of facts by an individual or institution, which leads to an underserved benefit to the perpetrators while the victim suffers loss or harm.

California Penal Code Sections 368 (d) and (e) pertains to Elder Financial Abuse Fraud and Penal Code Section 532 Theft by False Pretenses are covered more thoroughly in another chapter herein.

California Penal Code Section 532, Theft by False Pretenses is another aspect of Fraud and is punishable by up to 3 years in prison.

Every person who knowingly or designedly by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense defrauds any other person of money, labor or property whether real or personal, or causes or procures others is punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as for larceny of the money or property so obtained.

Mail Fraud also includes any form of communication that involves utilizing the U.S.Mail service in any manner whatsoever, whether through payments to or from the individual or entity committing the offense that may or may not use online to help facilitate the crime.

Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. 1343— Elements of Wire Fraud under Section 1343 directly parallel those of the Mail Fraud statute, but requires the use of an interstate telephone call or electronic communication made in furtherance of the scheme.

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act includes wire fraud as one of the predicate offenses that can be used to charge someone with a RICO violation.

Wire fraud is a federal crime that involves using the internet or other electronic communication to defraud someone.

Racketeering is not a single crime or criminal act, but an organized scheme of people committing crimes such as Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud and others including (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy). It may include many different crimes occurring over a period of time. It’s also possible that they all committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.

The RICO statute, as it relates to the entirety of the organizations and the individuals listed herein, is going to be their downfall as it is the simplest crimes to prosecute and the severity of the monumental punishments are the most profound and because all of the necessary evidence is readily accessible and each and every person who has financially abused this elder will rue the day that they chose to severely harm this elder with impunity never grasping that a rarely used law is going to bring them to receive the justice they surely deserve.

By utilizing the Internet to commit the numerous crimes against this elder all of the individuals and organizations named herein are guilty of all the offenses including and especially the RICO act et al and therefore could be charged with and prosecuted for these crimes and the punishment could be as little as 4 years or up to 20 years imprisonment which could possibly turn into a life sentence.

The RICO crimes are an ongoing criminal offense and not a one time event because the perpetrators have continuously been asked to desist from blocking the numerous domain names and websites but they have ignored the requests and deliberately continued blocking and preventing the public from accessing and viewing the contents of the websites, the crimes of elder abuse and criminal conspiracy has never stopped therefore the pain and suffering of the abuse is an ongoing problem without any end in sight which means the RICO acts of Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, Identify Theft, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy) continues unabated to this very day.

Jeff Bezos will need to postpone his wedding and honeymoon with Lauren Sanchez because he will be spending considerable amount of time in jail (or state prison) along with these coconspirators, Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Scott Wagner, Blake Irving, Ray Winborne and several executives of their respective companies (many names will be added when identified so at the moment they will be referred to as John and Jane Does) which are considerable.

These felonies are quite serious and have caused immense pain and suffering for many years to this elder and even though they were asked numerous times to desist from engaging in their criminal behavior they continued do so with impunity apparently not realizing that there is a law specifically designed to prevent this type of criminal behavior against an elder, and they chose to deliberately ignore the requests unconcerned that they would be held accountable and severely punished for their despicable conduct. Now is the time for them to be brought to justice and face the charges of Elder Abuse, Criminal Conspiracy, Conversion, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Embezzlement and Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property among others.

This Conspiracy could also be considered as “identity theft” as blocking or commandeering another’s domain names and websites could be construed as stealing their personal identity and punishable as such, which carries a more severe form of jail time such as an additional 16 months to 3 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

The fine in this case is insignificant to these offenders, but it would be difficult for them to spend even one day in incarceration which is a distinct possibility given the severity of their crimes, especially since they did them in tandem over several years in time.

California Penal Code Section 182 defines criminal conspiracy as an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime:

Elements of the crime:

The prosecutor must prove that the defendants intentionally agreed with others to commit any crime,

The defendants committed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement,

And the overt act was committed in California.

Conspiracy is a separate offense from the crime itself.

An additional offense comes in the form of the California Welfare and Institution Codes…

California Welfare and Institution Code Section 15610.30 (a)(1) A taking for “wrongful use” occurs when the defendants knew or should have known that its conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder.

Founder and former CEO Robert Pardons and current CEO Aman Bhutan, along with Blake Irving, Scott Wagner and Ray Winborne of GoDaddy stole 1,823 domain names from this elder which are Criminal Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Embezzlement, Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, all of which are felonies punishable by many years in prison in addition to considerable fines for each offense.

In the crime of Grand Theft there is another aspect to consider and that is when you steal something you’ve actually committed an additional felony and this is, “Receiving Stolen Property” because when the right hand steals something the left hand receives it, which translates into to two separate and distinct crimes that takes place which will add considerably to the length of time incarcerated in prison.

Bob Parsons and his coconspirator Aman Bhutani have several felonies to contend with, not just Elder Abuse but also Grand Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Criminal Conspiracy, Embezzlement and even the possibility of Identity Theft which was intimated earlier, so their potential time behind bars could be substantial to say the least. California Penal Code 530.5 Identity Theft is punishable as a felony for up to 3 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine added to all of the other felonies would amount to a considerable length of time incarcerated, possibly a full lifetime sentence in prison.

Penal Code Section 487 Grand Theft in California is punishable by 3 years in state prison, $1,000 fine, restitution, revocation or suspension of professional licenses, and deportation for non-citizens and 1 year of Probation.

Aman Bhutani was born in India but unaware if he is an American citizen or not, and if not the possibility is if he is convicted of Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, unhe could face deportation back to his homeland, and is something to be determined during a deposition hearing.

Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.

It differs from larceny in that the original taking was lawful, or with the consent of the owner, while in larceny the felonious intent must have existed at the time of the taking.

To prove the crime of embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. 666(a)(1)(A) the United States must establish the following specific elements in addition to the general elements:

1. There was a fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the private organization or State or local government agency;
2. the property came into the possession or care of the defendant by virtue of his/her employment;
3. the defendant’s dealings with the property constituted a fraudulent conversion or appropriation of it to his/her own use; and
4. the defendant acted with the intent to deprive the owner of the use of this property.

The requirement that the defendant act with the intent to deprive the owner of the property makes embezzlement a specific intent crime. This is exactly what GoDaddy did and the possibility exists that if GoDaddy is convicted of at least two, embezzlement or fraud felonies in the same trial and the total loss exceeds $100,000 they could each face an additional 5 years in prison in addition to the incarceration time proposed for the crime along with probation, restitution and deportation could be imposed on all of them.

In the unlawful confiscation of 1,823 Internet domain names the company GoDaddy severely harmed this elder and prevented the sale of said domains for an amount considerably higher than the original purchase price and especially one specific domain that was purchased by this elder for $20,000. Is it possible that the government could consider that each of the 1,823 domains a separate offense thereby having each one constitute up to 4 years imprisonment for all which would translate to a plethora of lifetimes? This would be absolutely awesome!

California Penal Code Section 507 - Fraudulent Conversion by a person entrusted with property or with power of attorney for sale or transfer. Every person entrusted with any property as bailee, tenant, or lodger, or with any power of attorney for the sale or transfer thereof, who fraudulently converts the same or the proceeds thereof to his own use, or secretes it or them with a fraudulent intent to convert to his own use, is guilty of embezzlement.

Conversion is defined to be an act of willful interference with personal property done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of the use and possession of personal property.

To establish a claim for conversion the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff owned, possessed, or had a right to possess the property (2) that defendant intentionally and substantially interfered with plaintiff’s property by taking possession of the property, preventing plaintiff from having access to the property, destroying the property, or refusing to return the property after demand (3) that plaintiff did not consent (4) that plaintiff was harmed and (5) that defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s harm

In the state of Arizona financial exploitation is defined as the improper use of an adult’s funds, property or resources, which includes denying the adult access to their wealth, this is part and parcel of Bob Parsons and Aman Bhutani’s stealing the assets of this elder and in Arizona the punishment ranges from 1 to 25 years incarceration in prison, not just jail, in addition to fines, fees and restitution. Depending on the seriousness of the elder abuse, criminal conspiracy and Grand Theft the courts are hesitant to impose probation and more than likely to impose prison sentences.

Because GoDaddy is an Arizona company and this elder resides in California there is an issue with Interstate Commerce involved and they committed their various crimes across state lines there are additional charges to be investigated by both Arizona and California authorities and the crimes would also fall in the Federal crime scenarios adding another jurisdiction to be prosecuted for, so there would be several causes of action to be adjudicated and the possibility of Federal prosecution which would indicate no possibility of parole after conviction. Quite serious to be sure and instead of a local jail time would need to be incarcerated in a Federal institution which has its own precarious circumstances.

Some circumstances can be viewed at www.GoDaddyIncSucks.com

Meta Platforms Inc. executive team including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, who will be named not only in the forthcoming lawsuit but also the criminal activity to be pursued by the government authorities for elder abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.

Senator Ron Wyden is demanding jail time for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg saying he should face serious consequences for allowing his social media platform to misuse consumers’ personal data and “Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly lied to the American people about privacy, I think he ought to be held personally accountable for which is everything from financial fines to — and let me underline this — the possibility of a prison term”

“He hurt a lot of people” this pretty much describes who and what he is and when a sitting US Senator says emphatically that he should be sent to prison that says it all in no uncertain terms, Mark Zuckerberg should be incarcerated in prison, and the circumstances described herein should help the government to prosecute him immediately!

The FBI, Department of Justice and various State of California policing agencies will need to become involved with the investigations to determine the extent of wrongdoing and culpability to be assigned to each individual who participated in the specific crimes.

In addition to the California Elder Abuse Act there are numerous Federal Statutes regarding the financial abuse of elders which are not yet disclosed herein however in due time they also will appear here and the punishments relating to those are quite extensive and the individuals discussed here will add considerably to their respective imprisonment time so their sentences will be commensurate with those specific statutes. These people should consult with their legal teams to determine how they are going to address those penalties and how they are likely to spend a tremendous amount of time incarcerated in either city jails or state prisons because the proof of their crimes are extensive will consume an inordinate amount of resources to attempt to defend their pathetic actions against one individual having done so deliberately and with malice of forethought and deplorable intent.

To sustain a conviction the government must prove the existence of a scheme; it is not required, however, to prove all details or all instances of allegedly illicit conduct.

It is well established that proof of every allegation is not required in order to convict; the government need only prove that a scheme or artifice to defraud existed and that the defendants willfully and knowingly devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and that he/she need not have performed the entire act themselves but availed others to participate in any facet of the alleged crimes which is why the executive staff can be found guilty and held accountable of the entire list of crimes alleged.

Since these individuals partook in the daily decisions that the company regularly makes in the normal course of business their guilt is analogous to the crimes and should be punished accordingly.

They definitely knew that their actions would be harmful and proceeded regardless of this harm.

Sheryl Sandberg
Nick Clegg
Susan Li
Javier Olivan
Chris Cox
Andrew Bosworth
Dave Wehner
Mike Schroepfer
Will Cathcart
Naomi Gleit
John Hegeman
Adam Mosseri
Michael Protti
Adam Schultz
Tom Alison
Nicola Mendlesohn
Justin Osofsky

The individuals named herein may not have been fully aware of the criminal felony of Elder Abuse et al but the fact is that ignorance of the law is not an excuse, therefore the punishment is the same regardless of their lack of knowledge pertaining to the law.

It appears that Jeff Bezos may have a predilection to lying, for example the BBC and Reuters wrote that Jeff Bezos may have lied to the United States Congress a few years ago as evidenced by the attached letter in 2020 during a hearing conducted by the Subcommittee of Antitrust, Commerce, and Administrative Law and if he has the gall to lie to the US Congress then it stands to reason that he wouldn’t hesitate to lie regarding the felony crimes committed against this Elder. The seriousness of testifying to Congress under oath and then lying during this testimony it leaves no doubt that he would be more than willing to lie about Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.

The fear of prosecution and eventually being convicted and sentenced to prison, Jeff Bezos most certainly would not be adverse to lying even more now.
Five U.S. lawmakers accuse Amazon of possibly lying to Congress following Reuters report.
By Steve Stecklow et al 10/19/2021

Amazon has been caught lying to lawmakers yet again about its labor practices, according to a bipartisan Senate letter June 6, 2024 just a few months ago.

Mark Zuckerberg of Meta has shown a proclivity to not only lie to the United States Senate, but also to abuse minors via his various websites such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp et al so it surely stands to reason that he would not hesitate to abuse elders such as this Elder as evidenced by the letter sent to him by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal et al dated November 14, 2023 (attached)

Senator Blumenthal to Meta CEO: “Mr. Zuckerberg, Do you believe that you have a Constitutional right to lie to Congress”? 1/31/2024
Mr. Zuckerberg: No but…

President Donald Trump in his new book titled ‘Saving America’ has emphatically stated that “We are watching him closely and if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison”.

Hopefully President Trump will be quite interested in the crimes that Mark Zuckerberg has perpetrated against this Elder, that he will see to it that Mr. Zuckerberg will pay the ultimate price when it is soon brought to his attention all the harm he has inflicted upon this person… and when he is inaugurated on January 20th next, the time for his punishment will be here and then Zuckerberg will know exactly what suffering truly is

Much more to follow…

Sundar Pichai the CEO of Google just committed another crime by removing this website from his search engine November 18, 2024
after receiving the below email accusing them of Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy. The exact blocking of this website is a Civil and Criminal act and this is further proof of his criminal behavior.

The below listed email and all that it encompasses is part and parcel to the new addressed individuals at Amazon.com including the founder and former CEO Jeff Bezos and the new CEO Andy Jassy and also several as of yet unknown executives who will be part of any and all legal proceedings and criminal charges involving Criminal Conspiracy which will eventually be brought to the attention of any and all state and federal investigators to conduct their own respective investigations pertaining to the elder abuse you caused me to suffer and endure for the past several years.

I have all of the evidence necessary for the various authorities to conduct their investigations for the purposes of prosecuting every single person who had any part in causing me unfathomable harm, emotional, financial and physical pain on numerous occasions.

Jeff Bezos and Andy Jassy et al, you perpetuated severe mental and financial harm and you did so with impunity and total disregard for the damage you fraught upon me knowing that it would cause me great harm anticipating that I had no recourse other than to file a lawsuit which with your plethora of lawyers that I would have absolutely no chance of winning and with the fact I would owe an exorbitant amount of legal fees that would literally bury me forever. That being the case I just walked away with no method of recuperating from the onslaught brought by your organization.

The tide has now turned and you are about to receive your comeuppance because this reasonably obscure California law has been brought to my attention which puts me firmly in the driver’s seat and in control for the first time my own destiny so to speak.

As stated earlier in the below email you violated me and now it’s my responsibility to bring justice to you and though the fines are meaningless to one of the richest persons on the planet you may very well spend several years in prison to account for your crimes against my humanity.

This California Elder Abuse Act is quite explicit in that what all of you have done to harm me carries very serious implications with jail time the most significant.

Even one days incarceration is something you would never have dreamt of for yourself but the possibility is definitely in your future and you deserve every ounce of punishment sent your way.

You abused me on so many different occasions that I would seriously doubt that it could be overlooked by the government agencies that will prosecute you to the hilt and I relish the opportunity to testify against you in a court of law that I can’t really think about anything else.

I’m absolutely sure that you never imagined that a prison sentence would be in your immediate future and your planned wedding and honeymoon with your betrothed Lauren Sanchez will have to be postponed indefinitely.

Unfortunately for her you brought this upon yourself by your causing me such pain and now your world will be unbearable as has mine by your abhorrent behavior.

Next comes Robert Parsons, founder and former CEO of GoDaddy along with his coconspirator Aman Bhutani to reap what they have sown together against me by stealing 1,823 unique and valuable domain names for which they will also receive the severe consequences of their actions. The amount of money they caused me to lose is monumental and far, far exceeds the $950 amount to categorize as a felony, no doubt about it and I’m sure the District Attorney and Attorney General of California will recognize how serious your crimes are. GoDaddy basically said we have so many great attorneys at our disposal that you just go ahead and file a lawsuit against us and we will bury you and our legal fees will eat you alive therefore I had to walk away with nothing including one specific domain that I paid $20,000 for and they took that one with the rest.

How many years will they spend in prison for their atrocities, only a short time will tell and the government lawyers will be able to outdo GoDaddy because they have unlimited resources at their behest to spend.

Meta, Amazon.com, GoDaddy and Google has all the money in the world yet no amount can keep the executives from spending time in prison for their despicable behavior towards me and your actions against me were for the purpose to teach me a lesson to not go against your respective companies because you are more powerful than the entire state of California and no one can hold you accountable, UNTIL NOW!

I could continue with this email for days regarding the massive pain and suffering all of you has inflicted upon me but I have to spend my time now constructing the website about you:
ElderAbuseAct.com which is the exact same name as the law that will make you pay for what you have caused me to suffer greatly, emotionally, financially and physically for several years now with finally and end in sight because I discovered the law that was just the vehicle I so desperately needed to obtain justice for myself.

There is a law in California (of which I am a resident) titled Elder Abuse Act, which includes several provisions including the Elder Financial Abuse Act and many others.

In California, elder abuse is defined as causing, or permitting an elder or dependent adult to suffer, or inflicting unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering towards an elder. Penalties for elder abuse in California include state imprisonment, county jail time, and fines.

This law was written to protect vulnerable elders from unscrupulous behavior in which anyone who takes unfair advantage against an elder can be held liable in both a civil and criminal court proceedings.

If your plethora of attorneys are not yet aware of these specific laws, both the state of California and Federal, it might not be a bad idea to familiarize themselves of them prior to my turning this monster over to the respective organizations best suited to bring this situation to fruition.

The California Legislature created this law in such a manner as to punish those who cause an elder financial harm of an unspecified amount, (meaning the amount could be minuscule) and all that the elder must establish is that he/she is a resident of California and is 65 years of age or older, then this individual may file both legal and criminal complaints against the perpetrator/s and if successful, may collect reasonable court costs and attorney fees, and if unsuccessful the plaintiff would not be liable to pay any of the defendant’s court costs or attorney fees, basically a double edged sword.

The state wanted this law to have a sufficient impact against those who have taken advantage of the elder that the abused elder would be more apt to file against a defendant and not be in fear of being obligated for their costs of any amount and therefore would pursue litigation and/or criminal charges while not incurring the defendant’s costs of said lawsuits.

Because of how these specific laws were created and the fact that even after they go to the limit I will not be obligated for any of defendant’s expenditures, meaning the law is quite explicit in that I will not be liable for ANY court costs or attorney fees of the defendant should I lose, so no matter how long this could draw out I can’t lose. One more fantastic aspect of this law is that should I die during the possibly prolonged proceedings, my heirs can pick up precisely where I left off at and ride it out to conclusion in which case they would inherit whatever assets I may leave behind brought about by this legal process.

I own several non trademark infringing domain names including
MetaQuestHeadsets.com and
RealityLabsMetaverse.com for example, that your company is aware of my ownership of same because I sent you an email in the past offering to sell them and a few others, so you can not now deny knowledge of my ownership so no plausible deniability exists as I also retained screenshots of them.

These specific domain names, and the numerous others are quite valuable in and of themselves and definitely in excess of $950 total, the amount which puts the financial damages in the category of a felony and not merely a misdemeanor, therefore the penalty for these multiple offenses could be jail time for the individual offenders. In this case those persons held accountable could very possibly be the CEO of the offending companies, namely Sundar Pichai and his coconspirator Mark Zuckerberg, who currently is the 3rd richest person in the world. A day without sunshine, meaning even one day’s incarceration in any jail or prison would be absolutely unbearable for either one of these rich individuals.

It is my contention that blocking of my domain names and websites could only have happened with the express approval and consent of the CEO of Google, namely Sundar Pichai and that Mark Zuckerberg conspired with him to severely harm me for owning these specific domains and not so flattering content in addition to FacebookWhistleblowers.com,
MetaCambridgeAnalytica.com, along with their corresponding websites, and several others that they preferred that I never owned or used a website describing some of the inappropriate actions that Meta engaged in throughout the past, which are numerous and will be addressed and included in the upcoming website, ElderAbuseAct.com, soon to be live.www.ElderAbuseAct.com

Criminal conspiracy is a serious offense in and of itself, carrying severe repercussions including incarceration and should be dealt with by the appropriate authorities separate from the elder abuse, and having the policing authority conduct their own thorough investigations to determine the extent of which took place and for what period of time and this would be quite disruptive to the individuals involved for a considerable length of time.

Depositions can be quite lengthy also and could unveil numerous negative activities unrelated to these specific allegations and could be quite harmful when they become exposed.

My domains, prior to my most recent email to you just a couple weeks ago, were listed very high in the Google search engine and were located on the first page and now, as of today and the past week or so they no longer appear on Google search engine whatsoever.

You can reverse these actions but you can’t alter the fact that took place to begin with, which doesn’t reverse the actual damages that occurred prior to the alterations.

My previous email to you copied the particular Google pages which established beyond a doubt the proof necessary to validate my assertions that financial damages have already occurred and therefore the Elder Abuse Act under California Penal Code 368(d) has already been violated so the irrefutable evidence has been proven beyond any doubt.

The value of these and other domains are definitely in excess of the $950 threshold necessary for this situation to fall under the felony statute.

In addition, the California Welfare and Institution Code 15610.30 Financial Abuse of an Elder or a dependent adult will also be part of the litigation.

We also have the Mental Suffering to consider, a 77 year old elder, suffering from a monumental Cancer scenerio having already undergone 22 unique surgeries with a new diagnosis requiring at least 3 more Cancer related surgeries and possible additional Radiation treatments, of which I have already received 33 sessions with my head bolted down to the table to prevent even the slightest movement, having just received the notice of 3 more positive Biopsies, along with some Chemotherapy which was obvious, going up against several $Trillion behemoths is in the David vs. Goliath mode that the jury would have difficulty not finding in favor of the blatantly abused and sympathetic elderly plaintiff.

The gist of this situation is there is a distinct possibility, however remote, that the guilty parties could spend up to 4 years in county jail and/or a $10,000 fine for each offense just from the California Elder Abuse Act not to mention the Welfare and Institution Codes plus the Federal Criminal Statutes including the separate crime of conspiracy which when all is said and done could be immense. Allowing these indiscriminate crimes to continue with impunity is unacceptable and therefore these actions must be condemned and punished under the law and all of the accusations alleged be brought to the attention of whichever legal authorities for prosecution forthwith.

The $ fine is insignificant to Meta or Google, Amazon nor GoDaddy however any amount of jail time is something to fear, regardless of how remote this possibility is.

The crimes have already taken place and the proof has been obtained so it’s only a matter of going through the motions and court proceedings and the enormous amount of potential law firms that might want an opportunity to have their names associated with a case of this magnitude is incalculable, win or lose, with absolutely no risk of owing any court costs or defendant’s attorney fees, a definite WIN WIN for these lawyers.

Negative publicity of this kind for both Meta and Google together with Amazon and GoDaddy is also something to consider for any public organization but the possibility does exist, to be certain.

Blocking my domain names so they don’t appear in the Google search results has already occurred and the financial loss, which is considerable, so the absolute proof is available for any judge or jury can readily see so I merely need to find an extremely competent law firm who would want to file against companies of your financial magnitude and wherewithal so they wouldn’t be concerned about receiving their reasonable attorney fees and in addition the heightened publicity and public awareness would be a tremendous benefit for their law practice.

It’s not difficult to establish that the domains in question far exceed $950 total minimum for the felony statute, this is a no brainer!

Financial harm may be established in a plethora of ways and the law does not designate any specific amount, merely that a loss was sustained by a state of California Elder of which I am.

Your stupendous legal team can confirm very easily what I have said regarding these laws harming an elder, and even though you and your coconspirator Sundar Pichai at Google, with whom you could not have accomplished this crime without his direct involvement, can undue the actions, however it is a definite fact that the damage has already occurred, therefore you can’t unspill the milk or unring the bell, the harm has already happened and you will reap what you sew and suffer the appropriate consequences regardless of how severe they all are.

It’s not easy to define precise Mental Suffering damages, nor the exact amount of financial harm, which as of yet is an unknown and undetermined future financial loss, in the courtroom I will do my utmost best to convey to a jury of my peers exactly how this anguish has affected me of my financial, physical and emotional pain and attempt to convince them some sense of carnage to my fragile health status considering my age and physical and emotional distress, which has been exacerbated by Meta’s and Google’s deliberate disregard for the abuse that both of you have deliberately caused me to endure.

I’m fairly certain that given enough publicity in advance of the trial, can bring about sufficient attention to garner the general population to put themselves in my place temporarily and hopefully have Meta and Google recognize their faults in this regard prior to initiating any criminal investigation transpiring so that this won’t happen again to any other unfortunate Elders ever.

I have just registered the domain name ElderAbuseAct.com for the express purpose of sharing the entire story as this progresses including this complete email so the general public, which includes Google and Meta visitors to follow this situation throughout the process in hopes that this will deter you from committing these outrageous behaviors in the future and to help them to disallow this sort of crimes to happen to them in the future.

Further to notification of the enormous amount of public support I will be advising the majority of news gathering organizations throughout the country by sending them the website information so hundreds, if not thousands, of them this email to garner the attention of the vast majority of California elders to hopefully prevent this sort of injustice from happening to them going forward.

I won’t be surprised if once the court case is filed, that your legal team will immediately file a demurrer in which case we will respond with another cause of action such as “intentional infliction of emotional distress” which will probably result in another demurrer being filed followed by an additional cause of action and so on etcetera, etcetera until we eventually run out of causes of action which would be considerable.

The end result of all of the above, and much more, will lay out for the entire world to see exactly how both of your organizations treat those that oppose your dastardly and corrupt practices and the forthcoming new website ElderAbuseAct.com will contain a tremendous amount of information relative to the criminal conspiracy investigation etc. by both state and federal authorities which could lead to either one or both of you being indicted, convicted, sentenced and incarcerated for your crimes which is KARMA in my opinion, because someone needs to get involved due to your unscrupulous behavior over a long period of time and even if all of this somehow allows you to escape the “gallows” so to speak you will at least know that you were in a battle!

This entire encounter with those entities who have harmed me should not go unpunished and whatever course of action is necessary to accomplish the ultimate goal of healing that I so desperately need shall not be in vain and both Google and Meta along with Amazon and GoDaddy should be held accountable for their unethical behavior.

PENAL CODE
§ 368(d)
(Financial Abuse of Elders and Dependent Adults - Non-Caretaker) Theft, embezzlement, forgery, fraud or identity theft with respect to property or personal identifying information of an elder or dependent adult With knowledge that he or she is an elder or dependent adult By person not a caretaker of the elder or dependent adult

When amount or value of property taken exceeds $950: Misdemeanor - one year county jail and/or $2,500 fine Felony - 2, 3 or 4 years in county jail and/or $10,000 fine
***Financial AbuseWelfare & Institutions Code § 15610.30. Financial Abuse* "Financial abuse" of an elder or dependent adult occurs when a person or entity does any of the following: Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both. Assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both. Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue influence, as defined in section 15610.70. A person or entity shall be deemed to have taken, secreted, appropriated, obtained, or retained property for a wrongful use if, among other things, the person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains the property and the person or entity knew or should have known that this conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder or dependent adult. For purposes of this section, a person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property when an elder or dependent adult is deprived of any property right, including by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary bequest, regardless of whether the property is held directly or by a representative of an elder or dependent adult. For purposes of this section, "representative" means a person or entity that is either of the following: A conservator, trustee, or other representative of the estate of an elder or dependent adult. An attorney-in-fact of an elder or dependent adult who acts within the authority of the power of attorney.** Mental SufferingWelfare & Institutions Code § 15610.53. Mental suffering"Mental suffering" means fear, agitation, confusion, severe depression, or other forms of serious emotional distress that is brought about by forms of intimidating behavior, threats, harassment, or by deceptive acts performed or false or misleading statements made with malicious intent to agitate, confuse, frighten, or cause severe depression or serious emotional distress of the elder or dependent adult.
CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit a criminal offense and take a concrete step toward the completion.
The conduct need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. A judge or jury may convict a person of conspiracy even if the crime never reaches completion.
In most jurisdictions, at least one co-conspirator must take some overt act to further the agreement.
The federal crime against conspiracy (18 U.S.C. Section 371) includes the following elements: Two or more persons conspire; To commit an offense against the United States, to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof; and One (or more) of such persons do an act to effect the object of the conspiracy With each state law, the elements of conspiracy will be similar. But criminal penalties for the crime may vary. In California, the crime of conspiracy will be charged at one category lower than the most serious felony that is the object of the conspiracy. If that crime is a state jail (lowest) felony, then the conspiracy charge will be a Class A misdemeanor.

Some states reserve the conspiracy charge for only target offenses that are felonies. Others permit the State to pursue conspiracy no matter the degree of the underlying offense.