CRIMINALIZES.com
ATTWhistleblower.com, ATT Elder Abuse, LevelBlueWhistleblower.com, WillJamVenturesWhistleblower.com, John Stankey ATT CEO Elder Abuse, John Stankey ATT CEO RICO Act Violations, John Stankey ATT Criminal Conspiracy, Robert McCullen CEO Level Blue, Trustwave & Will Jam Ventures Elder Abuse, Criminal Conspiracy, RICO Act Violations along with a plethora of “Cyber Threat” involvement.
The express purpose of this website is to determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the above listed names perpetrated several felonies against this website owner with impunity and should be investigated and eventually prosecuted for their crimes and incarcerated in prison along with being sued for their civil torts.
It is believed that the aforementioned conspired amongst themselves and others to commit numerous felony crimes, including “Grand Theft” (causing financial harm over $950 which constitutes a felony) by knowingly and with malice of forethought, to further their quest to destroy the individual and his legally owned property to enhance their reputation and financial fortunes at the detriment of others and therefore when proven guilty in a court of law to be sentenced to the maximum penalty prescribed by the law and to compensate the victim for their dastardly and illegal behavior.
This website will be a repository of information relating to the criminal behavior committed by them in a furtherance of felony activity showcasing every despicable act committed by them over a span of many years and they need to be held accountable for their crimes which could lead to a conviction and lengthy term of imprisonment and also since some of their crimes are both civil and criminal, legal action should be initiated in an appropriate court of jurisdiction to ensure that the accused be held liable for their illegal actions and pay compensatory and significant punitive damages should be assessed against them to the betterment of those harmed.
John Stankey blatantly harmed vulnerable seniors, which by his actions could lead a reasonable person to believe that the next step might be also harming another segment of society that of being vulnerable children, ergo Child Abuse. It’s not a far stretch to conceive that if he abuses one class of individuals that he might go further abusing others which would truly be despicable.
Further investigations could prove that possibility exists because a person with no integrity and who is considered sociopathic”would stoop to anything that harms another group of people and until the investigation is complete we won’t know for certain as everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
John Stankey has criminally cheated his ATT customers out of several hundred $ Million Dollars which is confirmed by the current $177,000,000 judgement issued against his company, which could not have happened without his direct involvement, which could be considered “Fraud”, “Mail Fraud”, “Wire Fraud” “Embezzlement”, “Conversion”, “Criminal Conspiracy” and a host of others still to be determined, of which only two need to be proven to establish a “RICO Act” felony.
It’s now a proven fact that John Stankey, by ATT having a judgement of the substantial amount of $177 Million Dollars establishes his disdain for his own customers meaning there is most likely no crime he wouldn’t commit therefore he should be punished for his dastardly actions
Even his wife, along with his son Justin and his daughter Erika can’t trust him, because of his blatant criminal behavior and when he is prosecuted for his felonies and sentenced to a lengthy prison term they will abandon him very quickly as he is definitely not a person to be trusted.
The individuals referenced herein are being investigated for possible violations of the RICO Act and considering that ONLY two “PREDICATE” offenses need to be committed during a 10 year period which realizing their propensity to violate the law with impunity should be relatively easy to prove and this website will leave no stone unturned to establish the true facts and have them prosecuted and convicted for their crimes under the RICO Act statute.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or RICO was passed in 1970 as a means by which the Federal government could combat organized crime. The act today is covered in 18 USC §§ 1961–1968 and provides the legal means by which prosecutors can identify and convict those who operate illegal businesses. Thus, “A RICO” is used when speaking of someone facing serious criminal charges related to organized crime and racketeering.
To be charged under RICO at least two “PREDICATE” offenses must have been committed through the enterprise during any 10 year period of time.
Generally, those convicted of Federal Racketeering / RICO crimes are sentenced to a maximum 20 years and $25,000 fines per count. So for a Federal RICO case at least two offenses in a ten-year period must be charged and in many cases, far more specific charges are brought.
Anyone facing Federal RICO charges will be facing other charges as well so that a loss of the case generally means spending the rest of one’s days in prison.
In addition, losing a RICO case can cost much more on the backside. Plaintiffs can use the outcome of the criminal trial to form the basis of a civil lawsuit. If such a case is lost, the cost is triple any damages claimed. For instance, if the case involved embezzlement of say, $100,000 then losing a civil RICO lawsuit will cost $300,000. RICO was originally aimed at the Mafia, over the past 37 years, prosecutors have used it to attack many forms of organized crime: street gangs, gang cartels, corrupt police departments, publicly traded corporations and even corrupt politicians.
Federal Racketeering or RICO offenses present a pattern of criminal behavior spanning years and multiple persons. A RICO conspiracy charge (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)) requires proving an agreement to violate RICO, even if the defendant only agreed to facilitate the enterprise’s criminal activity, not commit the predicate acts themselves.
Given this scenario it seems logical that another person
within the hierarchy of ATT would partake in the criminal activity, possibly the Senior Vice President Pascal Desroches or the Chief Financial Officer Thaddeus Arroyo, Chief Operating Officer Jeff McElfresh or other high ranking executives such as Kellyn Smith Kenny, Ed Gillespie and Lori Lee among others who also could be prosecuted, convicted and incarcerated which will be determined during the investigation, other names will be added soon.
There are 35 specific crimes included in the RICO Act.
Listed below are some of those 35 crimes constituting a RICO Act and only 2 during a 10 year period need to be proven to establish guilt which shouldn’t be difficult considering the various lawsuits that have been brought:
CEO John Stankey and several other ATT executives could be facing a tremendous lengthy incarcerations for their crimes and this will all be brought about by having committed Elder Financial Abuse and more.
AT&T has faced accusations and findings of misleading or failing to fully comply with congressional requests, particularly concerning government surveillance notifications for senators and providing data to special counsel Jack Smith's investigation, leading to congressional inquiries and questions about compliance with contracts and law
While not always "lying," reports indicate failures to notify senators about surveillance requests and providing incomplete or disputed information about turning over records, raising concerns about transparency and potential legal violations.
Key Incidents & Allegations:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act or RICO was passed in 1970 as a means by which the Federal government could combat organized crime. The act today is covered in 18 USC §§ 1961–1968 and provides the legal means by which prosecutors can identify and convict those who operate illegal businesses. Thus, “A RICO” is used when speaking of someone facing serious criminal charges related to organized crime and racketeering.
To be charged under RICO at least two “PREDICATE” offenses must have been committed through the enterprise during any 10 year period of time.
Generally, those convicted of Federal Racketeering / RICO crimes are sentenced to a maximum 20 years and $25,000 fines per count. So for a Federal RICO case at least two offenses in a ten-year period must be charged and in many cases, far more specific charges are brought.
Anyone facing Federal RICO charges will be facing other charges as well so that a loss of the case generally means spending the rest of one’s days in prison.
In addition, losing a RICO case can cost much more on the backside. Plaintiffs can use the outcome of the criminal trial to form the basis of a civil lawsuit. If such a case is lost, the cost is triple any damages claimed. For instance, if the case involved embezzlement of say, $100,000 then losing a civil RICO lawsuit will cost $300,000. RICO was originally aimed at the Mafia, over the past 37 years, prosecutors have used it to attack many forms of organized crime: street gangs, gang cartels, corrupt police departments, publicly traded corporations and even corrupt politicians.
Federal Racketeering or RICO offenses present a pattern of criminal behavior spanning years and multiple persons. A RICO conspiracy charge (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)) requires proving an agreement to violate RICO, even if the defendant only agreed to facilitate the enterprise’s criminal activity, not commit the predicate acts themselves.
Given this scenario it seems logical that another person
within the hierarchy of ATT would partake in the criminal activity, possibly the Senior Vice President Pascal Desroches or the Chief Financial Officer Thaddeus Arroyo, Chief Operating Officer Jeff McElfresh or other high ranking executives such as Kellyn Smith Kenny, Ed Gillespie and Lori Lee among others who also could be prosecuted, convicted and incarcerated which will be determined during the investigation, other names will be added soon.
There are 35 specific crimes included in the RICO Act.
Listed below are some of those 35 crimes constituting a RICO Act and only 2 during a 10 year period need to be proven to establish guilt which shouldn’t be difficult considering the various lawsuits that have been brought:
- Gambling
- *Criminal Conspiracy
- Murder
- Kidnapping
- Extortion
- Arson
- *Robbery
- *Bribery
- Dealing in obscene matter
- Dealing or trafficking a controlled substance or chemical
- Counterfeiting
- *Theft
- *Embezzlement
- *Fraud
- *Mail Fraud
- *Wire Fraud
- *Obstruction of Justice
- Slavery
- *Money laundering
- Commission of murder-for-hire
- Embezzlement of union funds
- Bankruptcy fraud or *Securities Fraud
- Criminal copyright infringement
- Human smuggling
- Acts of terrorism
CEO John Stankey and several other ATT executives could be facing a tremendous lengthy incarcerations for their crimes and this will all be brought about by having committed Elder Financial Abuse and more.
AT&T has faced accusations and findings of misleading or failing to fully comply with congressional requests, particularly concerning government surveillance notifications for senators and providing data to special counsel Jack Smith's investigation, leading to congressional inquiries and questions about compliance with contracts and law
While not always "lying," reports indicate failures to notify senators about surveillance requests and providing incomplete or disputed information about turning over records, raising concerns about transparency and potential legal violations.
Key Incidents & Allegations:
- Failure to Notify Senators of Surveillance: In May 2025, Senator Ron Wyden revealed AT&T (along with Verizon and T-Mobile) failed to implement systems to notify senators about government surveillance on their Senate-issued devices, despite contractual obligations, potentially leaving the Senate vulnerable.
- Cooperation with Jack Smith Investigation: In late 2025, investigations revealed AT&T initially pushed back on or claimed non-compliance with Special Counsel Jack Smith's subpoenas for congressional records, even as Verizon complied, with AT&T later confirming they provided records for some lawmakers like Kevin McCarthy.
- Past Allegations of Misinformation: In 2011, critics accused AT&T of spreading misinformation to Congress to gain approval for a merger, with lobbyists allegedly misleading lawmakers, according to Common Dreams.
- Bribery Conviction: In 2022, AT&T Illinois paid $23 million to resolve a criminal investigation for bribing state legislators to pass favorable laws, which involved influencing legislation through misconduct, noted Citizens Utility Board and Compliance Week.