ElderAbuseAct.com is a repository of information regarding the Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy conducted by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, his executive team at Meta Platforms Inc. along with the founder and former CEO of Amazon.com Jeff Bezos, and the current CEO of Amazon.com Andy Jassy, and several of their executive staff along with the CEO of Google Sundar Pichai, along with Ruth Porst, Philip Schindler, Thomas Kurian, Kent Walker, Lorraine Twohill, Peter Osterich and Sergey Brin also Robert Parsons, the founder and former CEO of GoDaddy and the current CEO of GoDaddy Aman Bhutani, and several of their executives including Blake Irving, Scott Wagner and Ray Winborne among others towards the owner of this elder abuse act website.
The focus of this website is to identify the perpetrators to the public of numerous State and Federal crimes against this elder and expose the various criminal acts they have committed, so that the specific governmental agencies and authorities will be notified and begin investigating, and eventually prosecute those responsible and after conviction, sentence the guilty to the incarceration in either jail or prison, whichever is most appropriate, thereby using their punishments as a deterrent for others to realize that crime does not pay, and prove to the public once and for all that no one is above the law and “if you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime”.
Elder Abuse in California is both a Civil and Criminal Offense.
Financial Elder Abuse is defined as “when a person or entity…takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder…for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.”
The California Elder Abuse Act was enacted in 1982 and has added several amendments over the past forty-two years.
If the financial harm against the elder exceeds $950 then the crime is considered a felony. The penalty for this crime is up to 4 years in county jail and a $10,000 fine for each separate illegal act.
California Penal Code 368 (d) Financial Abuse of Elders and Dependent Adults (Non Caretaker) Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Kurian, Lorraine Twohill, Kent Walker, Peter Osterich, Sergey Brin and Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and several of their respective executives have committed numerous felonies and are most likely to be indicted, charged, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for up to 4 years in county jail for each count along with countless thousands of dollars in fines each and if the majority of their company executives were also sent to jail, then there won’t be anyone left at their organizations to conduct the business, therefore the value of their company stock would be reduced exponentially, which could in turn affect the entire United States Stock Market.
Whether or not a wrongful taking has occurred is often at the core of any elder financial abuse case.
In certain extraordinary circumstances, victimized elders or their heirs can immediately file an application for a right to attach order, which liens any assets held by their alleged financial abuser. The lien in essence freezes the attached assets until final adjudication or settlement. In the most severe circumstances, the elder or their heirs can utilize this procedure on an ex parte basis without notice to the defendant.
These crimes were committed with full knowledge and forethought meant to harm this elder financially and with impunity!
These executives will suffer the consequences of their actions, including both jail time and monetarily considering the extent of their abusive criminal behavior.
In conducting further research regarding the criminal activity by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook it appears that this Elder’s privacy may also have been compromised and therefore the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) needs to be notified so that they could do their own thorough investigation to determine whether this was indeed violated, hence another substantial fine might need to be imposed, similar to the $5 Billion fine paid by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook in 2019, which became the largest breach of privacy penalty by any organization in the world, and this scenario could potentially be a repeat performance by Mark Zuckerberg.
Maybe Mark Zuckerberg and his various colleagues are not quite ready to spend time in prison yet but the felonies that he and the entire leadership team at Meta are more than likely to de convicted of several crimes along with Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Sergey Brin, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and their executive staff could be facing charges that could in fact send all of these criminals to prison for a considerable length of time together.
The United States Department of Justice, the US Attorney General along with the California Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General and even the Los Angeles District Attorney all need to be notified about the contents of this website so they can hopefully begin their respective investigations to determine to what extent these organizations and their respective executives regarding their criminal behavior and precisely how they have violated the specific laws referenced herein and to ascertain whether they have violated both State and Federal laws. Must of the crimes have been brought about here so as to leave no doubt about which crimes have occurred and who the perpetrators are.
Also the vast majority of governments around the world need to notified as well so they too can conduct due diligence and initiate their own investigations to determine what laws of there countries have been violated.
Australia, based on the law that they just passed November 28, 2024 to protect their children under the age of 16 needs to be adopted by others and hopefully so will the other large countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, India, Ireland and South Africa for starters of which will be sent this entire website so that they all will know how despicable these criminals truly are so they can determine whether they wish to continue doing business with them .
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a Federal Law (codified at 18 U.S.C. 1961-68) targeting organized criminal activity and racketeering.
The state of California has its own version of RICO Penal Code Sections 186.2 and 186.3 which includes forfeiture of profits derived from the criminal activity.
Federal RICO and California’s statutes share similarities in their approach requiring the occurrence of at least two specific offenses within a stipulated timeframe, typically a decade.
Forfeiture of property does not prevent the state of California from pursuing charges for the underlying crimes.
A sentence of imprisonment or other punishments may still be possible if the state wins a conviction on a separate charge and the penalties will depend on the nature of the underlying charges.
Organized crime laws focus on the financial profits gained by crime enterprises or associations through their participation in criminal activities.
Accordinaly California state law seeks to punish and deter participants from racketeering and organized crime through forfeiture laws. During forfeiture, the state seizes control and possession of the defendant’s property.
California racketeering laws are intended to focus only on the profits and proceeds from criminal activities. This makes the prospect of forfeiture quite devastating to the defendants.
Penalties for racketeering convictions in California can be severe and hinge upon case specifics. Probation may be an option in certain scenarios but incarceration is the frequent outcome.
Depending on the gravity of the charges, sentences range up to 20 years or even life imprisonment in a federal prison. Defendants may also face asset forfeiture, liens on their property, and restitution to their victims and even Deportation if the person is not a citizen.
RICO enhances existing criminal punishments and creates new causes of action for acts done as part of an organized criminal enterprise which can only be determined through an investigation of same.
RICO can be applied to individuals involved in a conspiracy to commit racketeering activities which means even those indirectly involved in the enterprise or its corrupt activities may face RICO charges if they conspired to further the criminal objectives.
A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed ; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment.
An enterprise” is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.
Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statue in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition.
“Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other.
A conviction under RICO has serious consequences. Not only does the RICO statute provide for criminal penalties including 20 years in prison, but the financial penalties are also quite severe.
A person convicted can face a fine of either $250,000 or double the amount of proceeds earned from the illicit activity. The prison time can increase from 20 years up to a life sentence depending on the underlying crimes that was committed.
The power of RICO lies in its “CONSPIRACY PROVISION”, based on an enterprise rationale, that allows tying together apparently unrelated crimes with a common objective into a prosecutable pattern of racketeering.
The RICO statue expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. 1962.
The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role.
The government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant’s ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise.
In the establishment of RICO, there was the fear that assets associated with the enterprise would disappear before a final judgment was issued.
RICO rules of procedure allow the government to freeze the assets of the defendant prior to the case even going to trial. The reasoning behind this was that making the government wait until a guilty verdict was entered would allow time for these assets to be well hidden. In the event of a conviction, forfeiture of the defendant’s entire interest in the enterprise is handed over to the government. Because of the loss of these assets, the enterprise can suffer irreparable harm and even dismantlement.
There are 35 distinct offenses that fall within the RICO statute of which Conspiracy, Elder Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as to GoDaddy) Mail and Wire fraud are eight of them of which only two are necessary to fulfill requirements for both Federal and California statutes and these establish patterns of criminal behavior, and even the possibility of Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
The eight most prevalent elements of RICO regarding the individuals and organizations contained herein which are considered “predicate offenses” are Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as these relate to GoDaddy) Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, and only two are required to establish those which are necessary to establish violations and convictions of RICO act. These organizations may have also committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
Mail Fraud is prosecuted under the Mail Fraud Act which was formulated in 1872. The federal government has jurisdiction if the illegal activity crosses interstate or international borders. There are two elements in mail fraud: (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail which includes the electronic transmission of information for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).
Under California law, Penal Code section 484 Fraud, is the misrepresentation of facts by an individual or institution, which leads to an underserved benefit to the perpetrators while the victim suffers loss or harm.
California Penal Code Sections 368 (d) and (e) pertains to Elder Financial Abuse Fraud and Penal Code Section 532 Theft by False Pretenses are covered more thoroughly in another chapter herein.
California Penal Code Section 532, Theft by False Pretenses is another aspect of Fraud and is punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
Every person who knowingly or designedly by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense defrauds any other person of money, labor or property whether real or personal, or causes or procures others is punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as for larceny of the money or property so obtained.
Mail Fraud also includes any form of communication that involves utilizing the U.S.Mail service in any manner whatsoever, whether through payments to or from the individual or entity committing the offense that may or may not use online to help facilitate the crime.
Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. 1343— Elements of Wire Fraud under Section 1343 directly parallel those of the Mail Fraud statute, but requires the use of an interstate telephone call or electronic communication made in furtherance of the scheme.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act includes wire fraud as one of the predicate offenses that can be used to charge someone with a RICO violation.
Wire fraud is a federal crime that involves using the internet or other electronic communication to defraud someone.
Racketeering is not a single crime or criminal act, but an organized scheme of people committing crimes such as Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud and others including (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy). It may include many different crimes occurring over a period of time. It’s also possible that they all committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
The RICO statute, as it relates to the entirety of the organizations and the individuals listed herein, is going to be their downfall as it is the simplest crimes to prosecute and the severity of the monumental punishments are the most profound and because all of the necessary evidence is readily accessible and each and every person who has financially abused this elder will rue the day that they chose to severely harm this elder with impunity never grasping that a rarely used law is going to bring them to receive the justice they surely deserve.
By utilizing the Internet to commit the numerous crimes against this elder all of the individuals and organizations named herein are guilty of all the offenses including and especially the RICO act et al and therefore could be charged with and prosecuted for these crimes and the punishment could be as little as 4 years or up to 20 years imprisonment which could possibly turn into a life sentence.
The RICO crimes are an ongoing criminal offense and not a one time event because the perpetrators have continuously been asked to desist from blocking the numerous domain names and websites but they have ignored the requests and deliberately continued blocking and preventing the public from accessing and viewing the contents of the websites, the crimes of elder abuse and criminal conspiracy has never stopped therefore the pain and suffering of the abuse is an ongoing problem without any end in sight which means the RICO acts of Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, Identify Theft, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy) continues unabated to this very day.
Jeff Bezos will need to postpone his wedding and honeymoon with Lauren Sanchez because he will be spending considerable amount of time in jail (or state prison) along with these coconspirators, Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Scott Wagner, Blake Irving, Ray Winborne and several executives of their respective companies (many names will be added when identified so at the moment they will be referred to as John and Jane Does) which are considerable.
These felonies are quite serious and have caused immense pain and suffering for many years to this elder and even though they were asked numerous times to desist from engaging in their criminal behavior they continued do so with impunity apparently not realizing that there is a law specifically designed to prevent this type of criminal behavior against an elder, and they chose to deliberately ignore the requests unconcerned that they would be held accountable and severely punished for their despicable conduct. Now is the time for them to be brought to justice and face the charges of Elder Abuse, Criminal Conspiracy, Conversion, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Embezzlement and Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property among others.
This Conspiracy could also be considered as “identity theft” as blocking or commandeering another’s domain names and websites could be construed as stealing their personal identity and punishable as such, which carries a more severe form of jail time such as an additional 16 months to 3 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
The fine in this case is insignificant to these offenders, but it would be difficult for them to spend even one day in incarceration which is a distinct possibility given the severity of their crimes, especially since they did them in tandem over several years in time.
California Penal Code Section 182 defines criminal conspiracy as an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime:
Elements of the crime:
The prosecutor must prove that the defendants intentionally agreed with others to commit any crime,
The defendants committed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement,
And the overt act was committed in California.
Conspiracy is a separate offense from the crime itself.
An additional offense comes in the form of the California Welfare and Institution Codes…
California Welfare and Institution Code Section 15610.30 (a)(1) A taking for “wrongful use” occurs when the defendants knew or should have known that its conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder.
Founder and former CEO Robert Pardons and current CEO Aman Bhutan, along with Blake Irving, Scott Wagner and Ray Winborne of GoDaddy stole 1,823 domain names from this elder which are Criminal Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Embezzlement, Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, all of which are felonies punishable by many years in prison in addition to considerable fines for each offense.
In the crime of Grand Theft there is another aspect to consider and that is when you steal something you’ve actually committed an additional felony and this is, “Receiving Stolen Property” because when the right hand steals something the left hand receives it, which translates into to two separate and distinct crimes that takes place which will add considerably to the length of time incarcerated in prison.
Bob Parsons and his coconspirator Aman Bhutani have several felonies to contend with, not just Elder Abuse but also Grand Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Criminal Conspiracy, Embezzlement and even the possibility of Identity Theft which was intimated earlier, so their potential time behind bars could be substantial to say the least. California Penal Code 530.5 Identity Theft is punishable as a felony for up to 3 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine added to all of the other felonies would amount to a considerable length of time incarcerated, possibly a full lifetime sentence in prison.
Penal Code Section 487 Grand Theft in California is punishable by 3 years in state prison, $1,000 fine, restitution, revocation or suspension of professional licenses, and deportation for non-citizens and 1 year of Probation.
Aman Bhutani was born in India but unaware if he is an American citizen or not, and if not the possibility is if he is convicted of Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, unhe could face deportation back to his homeland, and is something to be determined during a deposition hearing.
Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.
It differs from larceny in that the original taking was lawful, or with the consent of the owner, while in larceny the felonious intent must have existed at the time of the taking.
To prove the crime of embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. 666(a)(1)(A) the United States must establish the following specific elements in addition to the general elements:
1. There was a fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the private organization or State or local government agency;
2. the property came into the possession or care of the defendant by virtue of his/her employment;
3. the defendant’s dealings with the property constituted a fraudulent conversion or appropriation of it to his/her own use; and
4. the defendant acted with the intent to deprive the owner of the use of this property.
The requirement that the defendant act with the intent to deprive the owner of the property makes embezzlement a specific intent crime. This is exactly what GoDaddy did and the possibility exists that if GoDaddy is convicted of at least two, embezzlement or fraud felonies in the same trial and the total loss exceeds $100,000 they could each face an additional 5 years in prison in addition to the incarceration time proposed for the crime along with probation, restitution and deportation could be imposed on all of them.
In the unlawful confiscation of 1,823 Internet domain names the company GoDaddy severely harmed this elder and prevented the sale of said domains for an amount considerably higher than the original purchase price and especially one specific domain that was purchased by this elder for $20,000. Is it possible that the government could consider that each of the 1,823 domains a separate offense thereby having each one constitute up to 4 years imprisonment for all which would translate to a plethora of lifetimes? This would be absolutely awesome!
California Penal Code Section 507 - Fraudulent Conversion by a person entrusted with property or with power of attorney for sale or transfer. Every person entrusted with any property as bailee, tenant, or lodger, or with any power of attorney for the sale or transfer thereof, who fraudulently converts the same or the proceeds thereof to his own use, or secretes it or them with a fraudulent intent to convert to his own use, is guilty of embezzlement.
Conversion is defined to be an act of willful interference with personal property done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of the use and possession of personal property.
To establish a claim for conversion the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff owned, possessed, or had a right to possess the property (2) that defendant intentionally and substantially interfered with plaintiff’s property by taking possession of the property, preventing plaintiff from having access to the property, destroying the property, or refusing to return the property after demand (3) that plaintiff did not consent (4) that plaintiff was harmed and (5) that defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s harm
In the state of Arizona financial exploitation is defined as the improper use of an adult’s funds, property or resources, which includes denying the adult access to their wealth, this is part and parcel of Bob Parsons and Aman Bhutani’s stealing the assets of this elder and in Arizona the punishment ranges from 1 to 25 years incarceration in prison, not just jail, in addition to fines, fees and restitution. Depending on the seriousness of the elder abuse, criminal conspiracy and Grand Theft the courts are hesitant to impose probation and more than likely to impose prison sentences.
Because GoDaddy is an Arizona company and this elder resides in California there is an issue with Interstate Commerce involved and they committed their various crimes across state lines there are additional charges to be investigated by both Arizona and California authorities and the crimes would also fall in the Federal crime scenarios adding another jurisdiction to be prosecuted for, so there would be several causes of action to be adjudicated and the possibility of Federal prosecution which would indicate no possibility of parole after conviction. Quite serious to be sure and instead of a local jail time would need to be incarcerated in a Federal institution which has its own precarious circumstances.
Some circumstances can be viewed at www.GoDaddyIncSucks.com
Meta Platforms Inc. executive team including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, who will be named not only in the forthcoming lawsuit but also the criminal activity to be pursued by the government authorities for elder abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.
Senator Ron Wyden is demanding jail time for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg saying he should face serious consequences for allowing his social media platform to misuse consumers’ personal data and “Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly lied to the American people about privacy, I think he ought to be held personally accountable for which is everything from financial fines to — and let me underline this — the possibility of a prison term”
“He hurt a lot of people” this pretty much describes who and what he is and when a sitting US Senator says emphatically that he should be sent to prison that says it all in no uncertain terms, Mark Zuckerberg should be incarcerated in prison, and the circumstances described herein should help the government to prosecute him immediately!
The FBI, Department of Justice and various State of California policing agencies will need to become involved with the investigations to determine the extent of wrongdoing and culpability to be assigned to each individual who participated in the specific crimes.
In addition to the California Elder Abuse Act there are numerous Federal Statutes regarding the financial abuse of elders which are not yet disclosed herein however in due time they also will appear here and the punishments relating to those are quite extensive and the individuals discussed here will add considerably to their respective imprisonment time so their sentences will be commensurate with those specific statutes. These people should consult with their legal teams to determine how they are going to address those penalties and how they are likely to spend a tremendous amount of time incarcerated in either city jails or state prisons because the proof of their crimes are extensive will consume an inordinate amount of resources to attempt to defend their pathetic actions against one individual having done so deliberately and with malice of forethought and deplorable intent.
To sustain a conviction the government must prove the existence of a scheme; it is not required, however, to prove all details or all instances of allegedly illicit conduct.
It is well established that proof of every allegation is not required in order to convict; the government need only prove that a scheme or artifice to defraud existed and that the defendants willfully and knowingly devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and that he/she need not have performed the entire act themselves but availed others to participate in any facet of the alleged crimes which is why the executive staff can be found guilty and held accountable of the entire list of crimes alleged.
Since these individuals partook in the daily decisions that the company regularly makes in the normal course of business their guilt is analogous to the crimes and should be punished accordingly.
They definitely knew that their actions would be harmful and proceeded regardless of this harm.
Sheryl Sandberg
Nick Clegg
Susan Li
Javier Olivan
Chris Cox
Andrew Bosworth
Dave Wehner
Mike Schroepfer
Will Cathcart
Naomi Gleit
John Hegeman
Adam Mosseri
Michael Protti
Adam Schultz
Tom Alison
Nicola Mendlesohn
Justin Osofsky
The individuals named herein may not have been fully aware of the criminal felony of Elder Abuse et al but the fact is that ignorance of the law is not an excuse, therefore the punishment is the same regardless of their lack of knowledge pertaining to the law.
It appears that Jeff Bezos may have a predilection to lying, for example the BBC and Reuters wrote that Jeff Bezos may have lied to the United States Congress a few years ago as evidenced by the attached letter in 2020 during a hearing conducted by the Subcommittee of Antitrust, Commerce, and Administrative Law and if he has the gall to lie to the US Congress then it stands to reason that he wouldn’t hesitate to lie regarding the felony crimes committed against this Elder. The seriousness of testifying to Congress under oath and then lying during this testimony it leaves no doubt that he would be more than willing to lie about Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.
The fear of prosecution and eventually being convicted and sentenced to prison, Jeff Bezos most certainly would not be adverse to lying even more now.
Five U.S. lawmakers accuse Amazon of possibly lying to Congress following Reuters report.
By Steve Stecklow et al 10/19/2021
Amazon has been caught lying to lawmakers yet again about its labor practices, according to a bipartisan Senate letter June 6, 2024 just a few months ago.
Mark Zuckerberg of Meta has shown a proclivity to not only lie to the United States Senate, but also to abuse minors via his various websites such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp et al so it surely stands to reason that he would not hesitate to abuse elders such as this Elder as evidenced by the letter sent to him by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal et al dated November 14, 2023 (attached)
Senator Blumenthal to Meta CEO: “Mr. Zuckerberg, Do you believe that you have a Constitutional right to lie to Congress”? 1/31/2024
Mr. Zuckerberg: No but…
President Donald Trump in his new book titled ‘Saving America’ has emphatically stated that “We are watching him closely and if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison”.
Hopefully President Trump will be quite interested in the crimes that Mark Zuckerberg has perpetrated against this Elder, that he will see to it that Mr. Zuckerberg will pay the ultimate price when it is soon brought to his attention all the harm he has inflicted upon this person… and when he is inaugurated on January 20th next, the time for his punishment will be here and then Zuckerberg will know exactly what suffering truly is
Much more to follow…
Sundar Pichai the CEO of Google just committed another crime by removing this website from his search engine November 18, 2024
after receiving the below email accusing them of Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy. The exact blocking of this website is a Civil and Criminal act and this is further proof of his criminal behavior.
The focus of this website is to identify the perpetrators to the public of numerous State and Federal crimes against this elder and expose the various criminal acts they have committed, so that the specific governmental agencies and authorities will be notified and begin investigating, and eventually prosecute those responsible and after conviction, sentence the guilty to the incarceration in either jail or prison, whichever is most appropriate, thereby using their punishments as a deterrent for others to realize that crime does not pay, and prove to the public once and for all that no one is above the law and “if you can’t do the time, then don’t do the crime”.
Elder Abuse in California is both a Civil and Criminal Offense.
Financial Elder Abuse is defined as “when a person or entity…takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property of an elder…for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.”
The California Elder Abuse Act was enacted in 1982 and has added several amendments over the past forty-two years.
If the financial harm against the elder exceeds $950 then the crime is considered a felony. The penalty for this crime is up to 4 years in county jail and a $10,000 fine for each separate illegal act.
California Penal Code 368 (d) Financial Abuse of Elders and Dependent Adults (Non Caretaker) Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Kurian, Lorraine Twohill, Kent Walker, Peter Osterich, Sergey Brin and Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and several of their respective executives have committed numerous felonies and are most likely to be indicted, charged, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for up to 4 years in county jail for each count along with countless thousands of dollars in fines each and if the majority of their company executives were also sent to jail, then there won’t be anyone left at their organizations to conduct the business, therefore the value of their company stock would be reduced exponentially, which could in turn affect the entire United States Stock Market.
Whether or not a wrongful taking has occurred is often at the core of any elder financial abuse case.
In certain extraordinary circumstances, victimized elders or their heirs can immediately file an application for a right to attach order, which liens any assets held by their alleged financial abuser. The lien in essence freezes the attached assets until final adjudication or settlement. In the most severe circumstances, the elder or their heirs can utilize this procedure on an ex parte basis without notice to the defendant.
These crimes were committed with full knowledge and forethought meant to harm this elder financially and with impunity!
These executives will suffer the consequences of their actions, including both jail time and monetarily considering the extent of their abusive criminal behavior.
In conducting further research regarding the criminal activity by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook it appears that this Elder’s privacy may also have been compromised and therefore the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) needs to be notified so that they could do their own thorough investigation to determine whether this was indeed violated, hence another substantial fine might need to be imposed, similar to the $5 Billion fine paid by Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook in 2019, which became the largest breach of privacy penalty by any organization in the world, and this scenario could potentially be a repeat performance by Mark Zuckerberg.
Maybe Mark Zuckerberg and his various colleagues are not quite ready to spend time in prison yet but the felonies that he and the entire leadership team at Meta are more than likely to de convicted of several crimes along with Sheryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Sergey Brin, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Blake Irving, Scott Wagner, Ray Winborne and their executive staff could be facing charges that could in fact send all of these criminals to prison for a considerable length of time together.
The United States Department of Justice, the US Attorney General along with the California Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General and even the Los Angeles District Attorney all need to be notified about the contents of this website so they can hopefully begin their respective investigations to determine to what extent these organizations and their respective executives regarding their criminal behavior and precisely how they have violated the specific laws referenced herein and to ascertain whether they have violated both State and Federal laws. Must of the crimes have been brought about here so as to leave no doubt about which crimes have occurred and who the perpetrators are.
Also the vast majority of governments around the world need to notified as well so they too can conduct due diligence and initiate their own investigations to determine what laws of there countries have been violated.
Australia, based on the law that they just passed November 28, 2024 to protect their children under the age of 16 needs to be adopted by others and hopefully so will the other large countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, India, Ireland and South Africa for starters of which will be sent this entire website so that they all will know how despicable these criminals truly are so they can determine whether they wish to continue doing business with them .
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a Federal Law (codified at 18 U.S.C. 1961-68) targeting organized criminal activity and racketeering.
The state of California has its own version of RICO Penal Code Sections 186.2 and 186.3 which includes forfeiture of profits derived from the criminal activity.
Federal RICO and California’s statutes share similarities in their approach requiring the occurrence of at least two specific offenses within a stipulated timeframe, typically a decade.
Forfeiture of property does not prevent the state of California from pursuing charges for the underlying crimes.
A sentence of imprisonment or other punishments may still be possible if the state wins a conviction on a separate charge and the penalties will depend on the nature of the underlying charges.
Organized crime laws focus on the financial profits gained by crime enterprises or associations through their participation in criminal activities.
Accordinaly California state law seeks to punish and deter participants from racketeering and organized crime through forfeiture laws. During forfeiture, the state seizes control and possession of the defendant’s property.
California racketeering laws are intended to focus only on the profits and proceeds from criminal activities. This makes the prospect of forfeiture quite devastating to the defendants.
Penalties for racketeering convictions in California can be severe and hinge upon case specifics. Probation may be an option in certain scenarios but incarceration is the frequent outcome.
Depending on the gravity of the charges, sentences range up to 20 years or even life imprisonment in a federal prison. Defendants may also face asset forfeiture, liens on their property, and restitution to their victims and even Deportation if the person is not a citizen.
RICO enhances existing criminal punishments and creates new causes of action for acts done as part of an organized criminal enterprise which can only be determined through an investigation of same.
RICO can be applied to individuals involved in a conspiracy to commit racketeering activities which means even those indirectly involved in the enterprise or its corrupt activities may face RICO charges if they conspired to further the criminal objectives.
A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed ; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment.
An enterprise” is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.
Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statue in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition.
“Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other.
A conviction under RICO has serious consequences. Not only does the RICO statute provide for criminal penalties including 20 years in prison, but the financial penalties are also quite severe.
A person convicted can face a fine of either $250,000 or double the amount of proceeds earned from the illicit activity. The prison time can increase from 20 years up to a life sentence depending on the underlying crimes that was committed.
The power of RICO lies in its “CONSPIRACY PROVISION”, based on an enterprise rationale, that allows tying together apparently unrelated crimes with a common objective into a prosecutable pattern of racketeering.
The RICO statue expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. 1962.
The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. All that must be shown is: (1) that the defendant agreed to commit the substantive racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in two racketeering acts; (2) that he knew the general status of the conspiracy; and (3) that he knew the conspiracy extended beyond his individual role.
The government may show that the racketeering acts found to have been committed pose a threat of continued racketeering activity by proving: (1) that the acts are part of a long-term association that exists for criminal purposes, or (2) that they are a regular way of conducting the defendant’s ongoing legitimate business, or (3) that they are a regular way of conducting or participating in an ongoing and legitimate enterprise.
In the establishment of RICO, there was the fear that assets associated with the enterprise would disappear before a final judgment was issued.
RICO rules of procedure allow the government to freeze the assets of the defendant prior to the case even going to trial. The reasoning behind this was that making the government wait until a guilty verdict was entered would allow time for these assets to be well hidden. In the event of a conviction, forfeiture of the defendant’s entire interest in the enterprise is handed over to the government. Because of the loss of these assets, the enterprise can suffer irreparable harm and even dismantlement.
There are 35 distinct offenses that fall within the RICO statute of which Conspiracy, Elder Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as to GoDaddy) Mail and Wire fraud are eight of them of which only two are necessary to fulfill requirements for both Federal and California statutes and these establish patterns of criminal behavior, and even the possibility of Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
The eight most prevalent elements of RICO regarding the individuals and organizations contained herein which are considered “predicate offenses” are Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as these relate to GoDaddy) Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, and only two are required to establish those which are necessary to establish violations and convictions of RICO act. These organizations may have also committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
Mail Fraud is prosecuted under the Mail Fraud Act which was formulated in 1872. The federal government has jurisdiction if the illegal activity crosses interstate or international borders. There are two elements in mail fraud: (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail which includes the electronic transmission of information for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).
Under California law, Penal Code section 484 Fraud, is the misrepresentation of facts by an individual or institution, which leads to an underserved benefit to the perpetrators while the victim suffers loss or harm.
California Penal Code Sections 368 (d) and (e) pertains to Elder Financial Abuse Fraud and Penal Code Section 532 Theft by False Pretenses are covered more thoroughly in another chapter herein.
California Penal Code Section 532, Theft by False Pretenses is another aspect of Fraud and is punishable by up to 3 years in prison.
Every person who knowingly or designedly by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense defrauds any other person of money, labor or property whether real or personal, or causes or procures others is punishable in the same manner and to the same extent as for larceny of the money or property so obtained.
Mail Fraud also includes any form of communication that involves utilizing the U.S.Mail service in any manner whatsoever, whether through payments to or from the individual or entity committing the offense that may or may not use online to help facilitate the crime.
Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. 1343— Elements of Wire Fraud under Section 1343 directly parallel those of the Mail Fraud statute, but requires the use of an interstate telephone call or electronic communication made in furtherance of the scheme.
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act includes wire fraud as one of the predicate offenses that can be used to charge someone with a RICO violation.
Wire fraud is a federal crime that involves using the internet or other electronic communication to defraud someone.
Racketeering is not a single crime or criminal act, but an organized scheme of people committing crimes such as Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Embezzlement, Fraud, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud and others including (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy). It may include many different crimes occurring over a period of time. It’s also possible that they all committed Violations of Corporate Securities Laws.
The RICO statute, as it relates to the entirety of the organizations and the individuals listed herein, is going to be their downfall as it is the simplest crimes to prosecute and the severity of the monumental punishments are the most profound and because all of the necessary evidence is readily accessible and each and every person who has financially abused this elder will rue the day that they chose to severely harm this elder with impunity never grasping that a rarely used law is going to bring them to receive the justice they surely deserve.
By utilizing the Internet to commit the numerous crimes against this elder all of the individuals and organizations named herein are guilty of all the offenses including and especially the RICO act et al and therefore could be charged with and prosecuted for these crimes and the punishment could be as little as 4 years or up to 20 years imprisonment which could possibly turn into a life sentence.
The RICO crimes are an ongoing criminal offense and not a one time event because the perpetrators have continuously been asked to desist from blocking the numerous domain names and websites but they have ignored the requests and deliberately continued blocking and preventing the public from accessing and viewing the contents of the websites, the crimes of elder abuse and criminal conspiracy has never stopped therefore the pain and suffering of the abuse is an ongoing problem without any end in sight which means the RICO acts of Conspiracy, Embezzlement, Elder Financial Abuse, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, Identify Theft, (Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property as they relate to GoDaddy) continues unabated to this very day.
Jeff Bezos will need to postpone his wedding and honeymoon with Lauren Sanchez because he will be spending considerable amount of time in jail (or state prison) along with these coconspirators, Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Andy Jassy, Sundar Pichai, Ruth Porat, Robert Parsons, Aman Bhutani, Scott Wagner, Blake Irving, Ray Winborne and several executives of their respective companies (many names will be added when identified so at the moment they will be referred to as John and Jane Does) which are considerable.
These felonies are quite serious and have caused immense pain and suffering for many years to this elder and even though they were asked numerous times to desist from engaging in their criminal behavior they continued do so with impunity apparently not realizing that there is a law specifically designed to prevent this type of criminal behavior against an elder, and they chose to deliberately ignore the requests unconcerned that they would be held accountable and severely punished for their despicable conduct. Now is the time for them to be brought to justice and face the charges of Elder Abuse, Criminal Conspiracy, Conversion, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Embezzlement and Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property among others.
This Conspiracy could also be considered as “identity theft” as blocking or commandeering another’s domain names and websites could be construed as stealing their personal identity and punishable as such, which carries a more severe form of jail time such as an additional 16 months to 3 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
The fine in this case is insignificant to these offenders, but it would be difficult for them to spend even one day in incarceration which is a distinct possibility given the severity of their crimes, especially since they did them in tandem over several years in time.
California Penal Code Section 182 defines criminal conspiracy as an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime:
Elements of the crime:
The prosecutor must prove that the defendants intentionally agreed with others to commit any crime,
The defendants committed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement,
And the overt act was committed in California.
Conspiracy is a separate offense from the crime itself.
An additional offense comes in the form of the California Welfare and Institution Codes…
California Welfare and Institution Code Section 15610.30 (a)(1) A taking for “wrongful use” occurs when the defendants knew or should have known that its conduct is likely to be harmful to the elder.
Founder and former CEO Robert Pardons and current CEO Aman Bhutan, along with Blake Irving, Scott Wagner and Ray Winborne of GoDaddy stole 1,823 domain names from this elder which are Criminal Conspiracy, Elder Financial Abuse, Fraud, Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Embezzlement, Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, all of which are felonies punishable by many years in prison in addition to considerable fines for each offense.
In the crime of Grand Theft there is another aspect to consider and that is when you steal something you’ve actually committed an additional felony and this is, “Receiving Stolen Property” because when the right hand steals something the left hand receives it, which translates into to two separate and distinct crimes that takes place which will add considerably to the length of time incarcerated in prison.
Bob Parsons and his coconspirator Aman Bhutani have several felonies to contend with, not just Elder Abuse but also Grand Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Criminal Conspiracy, Embezzlement and even the possibility of Identity Theft which was intimated earlier, so their potential time behind bars could be substantial to say the least. California Penal Code 530.5 Identity Theft is punishable as a felony for up to 3 years in state prison and a $10,000 fine added to all of the other felonies would amount to a considerable length of time incarcerated, possibly a full lifetime sentence in prison.
Penal Code Section 487 Grand Theft in California is punishable by 3 years in state prison, $1,000 fine, restitution, revocation or suspension of professional licenses, and deportation for non-citizens and 1 year of Probation.
Aman Bhutani was born in India but unaware if he is an American citizen or not, and if not the possibility is if he is convicted of Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property, unhe could face deportation back to his homeland, and is something to be determined during a deposition hearing.
Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom such property has been entrusted, or into whose hands it has lawfully come.
It differs from larceny in that the original taking was lawful, or with the consent of the owner, while in larceny the felonious intent must have existed at the time of the taking.
To prove the crime of embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. 666(a)(1)(A) the United States must establish the following specific elements in addition to the general elements:
1. There was a fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the private organization or State or local government agency;
2. the property came into the possession or care of the defendant by virtue of his/her employment;
3. the defendant’s dealings with the property constituted a fraudulent conversion or appropriation of it to his/her own use; and
4. the defendant acted with the intent to deprive the owner of the use of this property.
The requirement that the defendant act with the intent to deprive the owner of the property makes embezzlement a specific intent crime. This is exactly what GoDaddy did and the possibility exists that if GoDaddy is convicted of at least two, embezzlement or fraud felonies in the same trial and the total loss exceeds $100,000 they could each face an additional 5 years in prison in addition to the incarceration time proposed for the crime along with probation, restitution and deportation could be imposed on all of them.
In the unlawful confiscation of 1,823 Internet domain names the company GoDaddy severely harmed this elder and prevented the sale of said domains for an amount considerably higher than the original purchase price and especially one specific domain that was purchased by this elder for $20,000. Is it possible that the government could consider that each of the 1,823 domains a separate offense thereby having each one constitute up to 4 years imprisonment for all which would translate to a plethora of lifetimes? This would be absolutely awesome!
California Penal Code Section 507 - Fraudulent Conversion by a person entrusted with property or with power of attorney for sale or transfer. Every person entrusted with any property as bailee, tenant, or lodger, or with any power of attorney for the sale or transfer thereof, who fraudulently converts the same or the proceeds thereof to his own use, or secretes it or them with a fraudulent intent to convert to his own use, is guilty of embezzlement.
Conversion is defined to be an act of willful interference with personal property done without lawful justification by which any person entitled thereto is deprived of the use and possession of personal property.
To establish a claim for conversion the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff owned, possessed, or had a right to possess the property (2) that defendant intentionally and substantially interfered with plaintiff’s property by taking possession of the property, preventing plaintiff from having access to the property, destroying the property, or refusing to return the property after demand (3) that plaintiff did not consent (4) that plaintiff was harmed and (5) that defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s harm
In the state of Arizona financial exploitation is defined as the improper use of an adult’s funds, property or resources, which includes denying the adult access to their wealth, this is part and parcel of Bob Parsons and Aman Bhutani’s stealing the assets of this elder and in Arizona the punishment ranges from 1 to 25 years incarceration in prison, not just jail, in addition to fines, fees and restitution. Depending on the seriousness of the elder abuse, criminal conspiracy and Grand Theft the courts are hesitant to impose probation and more than likely to impose prison sentences.
Because GoDaddy is an Arizona company and this elder resides in California there is an issue with Interstate Commerce involved and they committed their various crimes across state lines there are additional charges to be investigated by both Arizona and California authorities and the crimes would also fall in the Federal crime scenarios adding another jurisdiction to be prosecuted for, so there would be several causes of action to be adjudicated and the possibility of Federal prosecution which would indicate no possibility of parole after conviction. Quite serious to be sure and instead of a local jail time would need to be incarcerated in a Federal institution which has its own precarious circumstances.
Some circumstances can be viewed at www.GoDaddyIncSucks.com
Meta Platforms Inc. executive team including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, who will be named not only in the forthcoming lawsuit but also the criminal activity to be pursued by the government authorities for elder abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.
Senator Ron Wyden is demanding jail time for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg saying he should face serious consequences for allowing his social media platform to misuse consumers’ personal data and “Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly lied to the American people about privacy, I think he ought to be held personally accountable for which is everything from financial fines to — and let me underline this — the possibility of a prison term”
“He hurt a lot of people” this pretty much describes who and what he is and when a sitting US Senator says emphatically that he should be sent to prison that says it all in no uncertain terms, Mark Zuckerberg should be incarcerated in prison, and the circumstances described herein should help the government to prosecute him immediately!
The FBI, Department of Justice and various State of California policing agencies will need to become involved with the investigations to determine the extent of wrongdoing and culpability to be assigned to each individual who participated in the specific crimes.
In addition to the California Elder Abuse Act there are numerous Federal Statutes regarding the financial abuse of elders which are not yet disclosed herein however in due time they also will appear here and the punishments relating to those are quite extensive and the individuals discussed here will add considerably to their respective imprisonment time so their sentences will be commensurate with those specific statutes. These people should consult with their legal teams to determine how they are going to address those penalties and how they are likely to spend a tremendous amount of time incarcerated in either city jails or state prisons because the proof of their crimes are extensive will consume an inordinate amount of resources to attempt to defend their pathetic actions against one individual having done so deliberately and with malice of forethought and deplorable intent.
To sustain a conviction the government must prove the existence of a scheme; it is not required, however, to prove all details or all instances of allegedly illicit conduct.
It is well established that proof of every allegation is not required in order to convict; the government need only prove that a scheme or artifice to defraud existed and that the defendants willfully and knowingly devised a scheme or artifice to defraud and that he/she need not have performed the entire act themselves but availed others to participate in any facet of the alleged crimes which is why the executive staff can be found guilty and held accountable of the entire list of crimes alleged.
Since these individuals partook in the daily decisions that the company regularly makes in the normal course of business their guilt is analogous to the crimes and should be punished accordingly.
They definitely knew that their actions would be harmful and proceeded regardless of this harm.
Sheryl Sandberg
Nick Clegg
Susan Li
Javier Olivan
Chris Cox
Andrew Bosworth
Dave Wehner
Mike Schroepfer
Will Cathcart
Naomi Gleit
John Hegeman
Adam Mosseri
Michael Protti
Adam Schultz
Tom Alison
Nicola Mendlesohn
Justin Osofsky
The individuals named herein may not have been fully aware of the criminal felony of Elder Abuse et al but the fact is that ignorance of the law is not an excuse, therefore the punishment is the same regardless of their lack of knowledge pertaining to the law.
It appears that Jeff Bezos may have a predilection to lying, for example the BBC and Reuters wrote that Jeff Bezos may have lied to the United States Congress a few years ago as evidenced by the attached letter in 2020 during a hearing conducted by the Subcommittee of Antitrust, Commerce, and Administrative Law and if he has the gall to lie to the US Congress then it stands to reason that he wouldn’t hesitate to lie regarding the felony crimes committed against this Elder. The seriousness of testifying to Congress under oath and then lying during this testimony it leaves no doubt that he would be more than willing to lie about Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy.
The fear of prosecution and eventually being convicted and sentenced to prison, Jeff Bezos most certainly would not be adverse to lying even more now.
Five U.S. lawmakers accuse Amazon of possibly lying to Congress following Reuters report.
By Steve Stecklow et al 10/19/2021
Amazon has been caught lying to lawmakers yet again about its labor practices, according to a bipartisan Senate letter June 6, 2024 just a few months ago.
Mark Zuckerberg of Meta has shown a proclivity to not only lie to the United States Senate, but also to abuse minors via his various websites such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp et al so it surely stands to reason that he would not hesitate to abuse elders such as this Elder as evidenced by the letter sent to him by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal et al dated November 14, 2023 (attached)
Senator Blumenthal to Meta CEO: “Mr. Zuckerberg, Do you believe that you have a Constitutional right to lie to Congress”? 1/31/2024
Mr. Zuckerberg: No but…
President Donald Trump in his new book titled ‘Saving America’ has emphatically stated that “We are watching him closely and if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison”.
Hopefully President Trump will be quite interested in the crimes that Mark Zuckerberg has perpetrated against this Elder, that he will see to it that Mr. Zuckerberg will pay the ultimate price when it is soon brought to his attention all the harm he has inflicted upon this person… and when he is inaugurated on January 20th next, the time for his punishment will be here and then Zuckerberg will know exactly what suffering truly is
Much more to follow…
Sundar Pichai the CEO of Google just committed another crime by removing this website from his search engine November 18, 2024
after receiving the below email accusing them of Elder Abuse and Criminal Conspiracy. The exact blocking of this website is a Civil and Criminal act and this is further proof of his criminal behavior.
